On 2021/06/20 22:31, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-06-11 at 16:13 +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > any takers?
> >
> > On Fri, 2021-06-04 at 22:11 +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > > ping
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2021-05-28 at 08:19 +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > > > As the
On Fri, 2021-06-11 at 16:13 +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> any takers?
>
> On Fri, 2021-06-04 at 22:11 +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > ping
> >
> > On Fri, 2021-05-28 at 08:19 +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > > As the original comment said:
> > > /*
> > > * This should probably go
any takers?
On Fri, 2021-06-04 at 22:11 +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> ping
>
> On Fri, 2021-05-28 at 08:19 +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > As the original comment said:
> > /*
> > * This should probably go into parsevarbinds, but that's for a
> > * next refactor
> > */
> >
> > This
ping
On Fri, 2021-05-28 at 08:19 +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> As the original comment said:
> /*
> * This should probably go into parsevarbinds, but that's for a
> * next refactor
> */
>
> This moves the pdu parsing of traps into parsevarbinds.
> Added bonus, we can now see the packets
As the original comment said:
/*
* This should probably go into parsevarbinds, but that's for a
* next refactor
*/
This moves the pdu parsing of traps into parsevarbinds.
Added bonus, we can now see the packets in debugging mode:
startup
snmpe: listening on udp 127.0.0.1:162
ktable_new: new