Bob Beck wrote:
> No. DNS based whitelisting does not belong in there. because it is
> slow and DOS'able
>
> spamd is designed to be high speed low drag. If you want to do a DNS
> based whitelist, write a little co-thing that spits one into a file or
> into your nospamd table that then spamd *doe
I forgot to attach my prototype. Here it is.
On 2016-03-29 Bob Beck wrote:
> No. DNS based whitelisting does not belong in there. because it is
> slow and DOS'able
>
> spamd is designed to be high speed low drag. If you want to do a DNS
> based whitelist, write a little co-thing that spits one
No. DNS based whitelisting does not belong in there. because it is
slow and DOS'able
spamd is designed to be high speed low drag. If you want to do a DNS
based whitelist, write a little co-thing that spits one
into a file or into your nospamd table that then spamd *does not even see*.
In short *
Hi,
I want to use a DNS white list to skip greylisting delays for known
good addresses, which would pass the greylist anyway.
To do this with spamd and OpenSMTPd I wrote a prototype which intercepts
the initial SYN packet from any non-whitelisted ip. It then queries DNS
whitelists and on any posit
