On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 10:54:39AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> Here is an updated version of the PRU_ATTACH diff. I looked at the pfkey
> code and decided to only do the minimum now. I will go in afterwards and
> kill the dynamic fiddling in there. There is no reason for all this
> complication
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:33:53AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 28/02/17(Tue) 07:15, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:22:03PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > +int
> > > > +pfkey_attach(struct socket *so, int proto)
> > > > {
> > >
> > > I think you
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:33:53AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 28/02/17(Tue) 07:15, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:22:03PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > +int
> > > > +pfkey_attach(struct socket *so, int proto)
> > > > {
> > >
> > > I think you
On 28/02/17(Tue) 07:15, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:22:03PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> [...]
> > > +int
> > > +pfkey_attach(struct socket *so, int proto)
> > > {
> >
> > I think you forgot the check from pfkey_usrreq() here.
> >
> > if
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:22:03PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 10:56:16AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > This diff works for me but I did not test each and every protocol (TCP,
> > UDP, ICMP, AF_UNIX work).
>
> I am currently running it with all regression tests.
>
>
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 10:56:16AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> This diff works for me but I did not test each and every protocol (TCP,
> UDP, ICMP, AF_UNIX work).
I am currently running it with all regression tests.
> Also not sure if I should renumber the PRU_* defines... in a way this can
>
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 07:51:14AM -0700, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 10:56:16 +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
> > Attaching a PCB to a socket is currently done via PRU_ATTACH but in most
> > cases this does not need the network / socket lock since no packets can be
> > received or
On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 10:56:16 +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> Attaching a PCB to a socket is currently done via PRU_ATTACH but in most
> cases this does not need the network / socket lock since no packets can be
> received or sent over this socket (needs a bind or connect first)
> It also cleans up
Attaching a PCB to a socket is currently done via PRU_ATTACH but in most
cases this does not need the network / socket lock since no packets can be
received or sent over this socket (needs a bind or connect first)
It also cleans up a few other ugly things like how the proto is passed.
This diff
