On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:37:16AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Note that the diff below still includes a false positive. If the
> current thread doesn't have the read-lock but another one has it,
> then RW_READ will still be returned.
That's true if witness(4) has not been enabled.
On 13/11/17(Mon) 17:29, Visa Hankala wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 01:25:42PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > I'd love is somebody could do the changes in the rwlock API to let us
> > check if we're holding a lock. Maybe this is already present in
> > witness(4), visa?
>
> witness(4) does
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 01:25:42PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> I'd love is somebody could do the changes in the rwlock API to let us
> check if we're holding a lock. Maybe this is already present in
> witness(4), visa?
witness(4) does maintain data about lock ownership. The patch below
might
Hello,
> > So I'd like to know, what's the plan for NET_ASSERT_LOCKED() macro?
> >
> > a) are we going to relax it, so it will test if the net_lock is
> > locked?
>
> Yep, that's already done.
cool, thanks a lot. I've just noticed the change is there while ago, while
On 13/11/17(Mon) 12:14, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> your change looks good to me. Though I have a comment/question to your diff.
>
> > Index: net/if_vxlan.c
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_vxlan.c,v
> > retrieving revision
Hello,
your change looks good to me. Though I have a comment/question to your diff.
> Index: net/if_vxlan.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_vxlan.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.63
> diff -u -p -r1.63 if_vxlan.c
> ---
After auditing all the pr_input() functions, the only missing bits
for taking them out of the KERNEL_LOCK() are: ``etheripstat''. I
leave such counter conversions for somebody else (8
In the meantime I annotated globals used in these functions. Most
of the pseudo-interfaces have a global list
