On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 14:45 -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
recent commit to pirofti made me wonder why don't we take an advantage
of the 64 bit bswap instruction on amd64?
Here's a revised diff with two changes from Mike's:
1) use %0 instead
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 02:45:06PM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
recent commit to pirofti made me wonder why don't we take an advantage
of the 64 bit bswap instruction on amd64?
Here's a revised diff with two changes from Mike's:
1) use %0
recent commit to pirofti made me wonder why don't we take an advantage
of the 64 bit bswap instruction on amd64?
Index: arch/amd64/include/endian.h
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/src/sys/arch/amd64/include/endian.h,v
retrieving revision 1.3
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 04:50:08PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
recent commit to pirofti made me wonder why don't we take an advantage
of the 64 bit bswap instruction on amd64?
Bah, you beat me to it!
bswap r64 is the way to do it, but I'm not sure what the second line is
supposed to do.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:31:57AM -0800, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Paul Irofti p...@irofti.net wrote:
bswap r64 is the way to do it, but I'm not sure what the second line is
supposed to do.
It's just the syntax for GCC's Statements and Declarations in
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Paul Irofti p...@irofti.net wrote:
bswap r64 is the way to do it, but I'm not sure what the second line is
supposed to do.
It's just the syntax for GCC's Statements and Declarations in
Expressions extension:
Rude and uncalled for, Marco. Not very nice of you.
Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 03:01:47PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
| http://stallman.oURL_CHANGED_TO_PROTECT_THE_INNOCENT.jpg
|
| On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 08:28:06PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
| On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
recent commit to pirofti made me wonder why don't we take an advantage
of the 64 bit bswap instruction on amd64?
Here's a revised diff with two changes from Mike's:
1) use %0 instead of %1, as the %N operands are zero-based. (I dare
anyone to
