On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 06:22:36PM +0100, Vincent Gross wrote:
> The current use of in_pcblookup() in in6_pcbconnect() is suboptimal :
> all of the addresses and ports are defined, we are only interested in
> exact matches, and its v4 cousin in_pcbconnect() already uses
> in_pcbhashlookup().
>
>
The current use of in_pcblookup() in in6_pcbconnect() is suboptimal :
all of the addresses and ports are defined, we are only interested in
exact matches, and its v4 cousin in_pcbconnect() already uses
in_pcbhashlookup().
Ok ?
Index: sys/netinet6/in6_pcb.c
