On 2013/05/04 01:49, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/05/04 01:40, Stuart Henderson wrote:
--- uthum.c 15 Apr 2013 09:23:02 - 1.19
+++ uthum.c 4 May 2013 00:19:28 -
@@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ uthum_ntc_getdata(struct uthum_softc *sc
return EIO;
/* get sensor
Hi,
Only I can remember is the NTC sensor calibration mechanism is
very complicated and it was hard to reverse engineering.
To fix (or discuss) the problem, I have to find my memo of the device.
Would you wait till next week? (all temper devices are in my office and
maybe the memo also in my
On 2013/05/04 23:32, Yojiro UO wrote:
Hi,
Only I can remember is the NTC sensor calibration mechanism is
very complicated and it was hard to reverse engineering.
To fix (or discuss) the problem, I have to find my memo of the device.
Would you wait till next week? (all temper devices are
On 2013/04/30 17:39, I wrote:
Seems to work well enough; and unlike my uthum (one of the dual-sensor ones)
it seems to stay attached without dropping out all the time.
So I've tracked this uthum problem down a bit further...
uthum: ntc tuning start. cur state = 0x66, val = 0x8435
uthum: ntc
On 2013/05/04 01:40, Stuart Henderson wrote:
--- uthum.c 15 Apr 2013 09:23:02 - 1.19
+++ uthum.c 4 May 2013 00:19:28 -
@@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ uthum_ntc_getdata(struct uthum_softc *sc
return EIO;
/* get sensor value */
- if (uthum_read_data(sc,