On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Claus Assmann
ca+openbsd_t...@esmtp.org wrote:
Should the type of ssizearg be ssize_t?
Yep, at least as long as it exists as a distinct member in that union.
I see FreeBSD at least has tossed it and uses the size_t member to
store ssize_t values, which is indeed
Should the type of ssizearg be ssize_t?
Index: vfprintf.c
===
RCS file: cvs/src/lib/libc/stdio/vfprintf.c,v
retrieving revision 1.58
diff -u -r1.58 vfprintf.c
--- vfprintf.c 9 Nov 2009 00:18:27 - 1.58
+++ vfprintf.c 17