Re: vi(1): remove stub settings

2017-07-02 Thread Martin Natano
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 09:19:31AM -0600, Anthony J. Bentley wrote: > > Here's a diff that updates the STANDARDS section in the manual. > I think it will be enough to talk about our POSIX compliance. POSIX > discusses its differences from historical ex/vi in great detail, > including an explicit

Re: vi(1): remove stub settings

2017-06-30 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 09:19:31AM -0600, Anthony J. Bentley wrote: > Christian Weisgerber writes: > > On 2017-06-29, "Anthony J. Bentley" wrote: > > > > > The vi manual is long enough. It doesn't seem very helpful to keep stubs > > > that have been stubs for 20 years. > > >

Re: vi(1): remove stub settings

2017-06-30 Thread Anthony J. Bentley
Christian Weisgerber writes: > On 2017-06-29, "Anthony J. Bentley" wrote: > > > The vi manual is long enough. It doesn't seem very helpful to keep stubs > > that have been stubs for 20 years. > > Should we retain some documentation along the lines of "nex/nvi > does not

Re: vi(1): remove stub settings

2017-06-30 Thread Christian Weisgerber
On 2017-06-29, "Anthony J. Bentley" wrote: > The vi manual is long enough. It doesn't seem very helpful to keep stubs > that have been stubs for 20 years. Should we retain some documentation along the lines of "nex/nvi does not implement the following options from the

vi(1): remove stub settings

2017-06-29 Thread Anthony J. Bentley
Hi, >From vi(1): lisp [off] (...) This option is not yet implemented. modelines, modeline [off] (...) This option will never be implemented. optimize, opt [on] (...) This option is not yet implemented redraw, re [off]