Re: vmm update

2015-12-06 Thread Mike Larkin
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 06:31:34PM +0100, Norman Golisz wrote: > On Thu Nov 26 2015 15:11, Karel Gardas wrote: > > Not sure, but on misc you can search for "vmm uvm_fault in vmware > > player/workstation when Intel VT/AMD-v not enabled" thread from which > > it looks like vmm requires extended-page

Re: vmm update

2015-11-26 Thread Norman Golisz
On Thu Nov 26 2015 15:11, Karel Gardas wrote: > Not sure, but on misc you can search for "vmm uvm_fault in vmware > player/workstation when Intel VT/AMD-v not enabled" thread from which > it looks like vmm requires extended-page tables virtualization > feature. Looks like this could indeed be rela

Re: vmm update

2015-11-26 Thread Karel Gardas
Not sure, but on misc you can search for "vmm uvm_fault in vmware player/workstation when Intel VT/AMD-v not enabled" thread from which it looks like vmm requires extended-page tables virtualization feature. Certainly this is not presented on my T500 so I would guess it's neither on your T400. Plea

Re: vmm update

2015-11-26 Thread Norman Golisz
On Wed Nov 25 2015 22:00, Gregor Best wrote: > on amd64 with a snapshot from today, I'm getting (transcribed): > > kernel: page fault trap, code=0 > ddb{1}> trace > vm_writepage() at vm_writepage+0x158 > VOP_IOCTL() at VOP_IOCTL+0x44 > vn_ioctl() at vn_ioctl+0x77 >

Re: vmm update

2015-11-25 Thread Gregor Best
Hi Mike, on amd64 with a snapshot from today, I'm getting (transcribed): kernel: page fault trap, code=0 ddb{1}> trace vm_writepage() at vm_writepage+0x158 VOP_IOCTL() at VOP_IOCTL+0x44 vn_ioctl() at vn_ioctl+0x77 sys_ioctl() at sys_ioctl+0x196

vmm update

2015-11-22 Thread Mike Larkin
An early rough cut of the vmm subsystem is now in the tree. This includes both the kernel parts and userland parts. There are still lots of things that need to be fixed and improved. For this reason, it is still disabled by default. But there is enough there for people to start playing with runni