Комерческое предложение

2012-04-22 Thread veter
com-bis.com P-PP : PoP;ocQaP;Q P=oe yP2eP;P8QP5P=P8e P$oQPP8QoP2P0P=P8P5 P=P5oP3QP0P=P8QP5P=P=PP3o P:oPP?P;P5P:QP0 P8P=QoQPP0QP8P8, P4oQQQP?P=PP9 24Q7 P2 P;QP1PP9 QoQP:P5 P?P;aP=P5QQ PoQQQP? P: QPQP3oP2PP9 P?P;PQ P0P4P:P5 P#P:QP0P8P=Q P8 QQQaP= P!PP

Re: diff: IUTF8 support

2012-04-22 Thread Nicholas Marriott
This makes sense to me. I think there is no sane way to handle UTF-8 characters of width != 1... On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 05:44:19AM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote: While reading the mosh research paper[1], I noticed we don't have IUTF8, which is necessary for backspace to work correctly in

diff: small diff for pipex.c

2012-04-22 Thread YASUOKA Masahiko
Remove redundant returns from functions returning void. Wrap return values in () for consistency. diff from Michael W. Bombardieri. ok? Index: sys/net/pipex.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/pipex.c,v retrieving revision 1.27 diff

amd64: Check cpu_vendor instead of using CPUID.

2012-04-22 Thread Christiano F. Haesbaert
There's no need for doing that somewhat strange comparison, the rest of the code already uses cpu_vendor. ok ? Index: identcpu.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/amd64/amd64/identcpu.c,v retrieving revision 1.35 diff -d -u -p -r1.35

Re: amd64: Check cpu_vendor instead of using CPUID.

2012-04-22 Thread Franco Fichtner
Just being paranoid... strncmp? And how about consolidating style while at it? ! vs. == 0 - see code bits below change. Franco On 22.04.2012, at 15:12, Christiano F. Haesbaert haesba...@openbsd.org wrote: There's no need for doing that somewhat strange comparison, the rest of the code already

Séjour original à prix discount

2012-04-22 Thread Tourisme fluvial
Untitled Document Offres speacute;ciales printemps / eacute;teacute; : une semaine sur le CANAL DU MIDI (Agde Carcassonne) 480 euro; au lieu de 1219 euro; sur un bateau de 6 / 8 personnes (Triton 1050) Croisiegrave;re en individuel du 30 avril au 7 mai 2012 Soumis agrave;

Re: amd64: Check cpu_vendor instead of using CPUID.

2012-04-22 Thread Christiano F. Haesbaert
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 06:36:41PM +0200, Franco Fichtner wrote: Just being paranoid... strncmp? Why ? It's a terminated string vs a string literal, what do you wanna use as the third argument: strlen(AuthenticAmd) ? . 100% pointless. And how about consolidating style while at it? ! vs. == 0

Re: amd64: Check cpu_vendor instead of using CPUID.

2012-04-22 Thread Franco Fichtner
On Apr 22, 2012, at 7:58 PM, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote: On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 06:36:41PM +0200, Franco Fichtner wrote: Just being paranoid... strncmp? Why ? It's a terminated string vs a string literal, what do you wanna use as the third argument: strlen(AuthenticAmd) ? . 100%

Re: amd64: Check cpu_vendor instead of using CPUID.

2012-04-22 Thread Christiano F. Haesbaert
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 09:16:57PM +0200, Franco Fichtner wrote: On Apr 22, 2012, at 7:58 PM, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote: On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 06:36:41PM +0200, Franco Fichtner wrote: Just being paranoid... strncmp? Why ? It's a terminated string vs a string literal, what do you

Re: amd64: Check cpu_vendor instead of using CPUID.

2012-04-22 Thread Franco Fichtner
On Apr 22, 2012, at 9:32 PM, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote: On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 09:16:57PM +0200, Franco Fichtner wrote: On Apr 22, 2012, at 7:58 PM, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote: On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 06:36:41PM +0200, Franco Fichtner wrote: Just being paranoid... strncmp? Why ?

bioctl(8) with duid

2012-04-22 Thread Stefan Sperling
Teach bioctl(8) to resolve disks via duid. The realpath provided by opendev() cannot be used since bioctl internally uses the volume name (e.g. sd0) rather than the full path to the device node. Mapping a duid to a volume name with an extra BIOCVOL call is not pretty but works. Index: bioctl.c