On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 18:50, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
On Wednesday, September 19, 2012, Theo de Raadt wrote:
arc4random() is also thread-safe (it has interal locking) and very
desirable for other reasons. But no way to
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Alexey Suslikov
alexey.susli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 18:50, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
On Wednesday, September 19, 2012, Theo de Raadt wrote:
arc4random() is also
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:41:09 +0300
From: Paul Irofti p...@irofti.net
I need this for acpi locking, okay?
(I'd also like to get rid of the silly x86_* prefix to match the i386
function name, but that's a different topic)
I disagree with the off-topic bit. What we do need is a
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Jean-Marc Robert
jeanmarc.rob...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a diff that should fix a few issues I've encountered with sftp's
tab-complete, and a few others that I found in the process.
Thanks, these have been committed (with some mild style adjustment).
--
Hi,
thanks to Mark, we have enough PCI bus number accounting, now to allow us
to attach ACPI bus numbers via ACPI. A patch to do this is below.
regards Christian
Index: arch/i386/i386/mainbus.c
===
RCS file:
On Wed Sep 19 2012 00:22, Paul Irofti wrote:
Any reason we have this disabled?
I ran with this diff in for quite some time w/o any problems.
Can you test this and let me know if anything bad happens?
My Thinkpad runs stable so far, everything still seems to work fine
(suspending to RAM also).
ping?
Curso Ejecutivo Internacional
Habilidades Gerenciales de Alto ImPACTO
Panama 10-12 de Octubre de 2012
Sheraton Panama Hotel Convention Center
QUALITY TRAINING, presenta un extraordinario seminario que se llevará a cabo
en la ciudad de Panamá ¡No se pierda uno de los eventos más interesantes en el
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:48:48 +0200
From: Christian Ehrhardt ehrha...@genua.de
Hi,
thanks to Mark, we have enough PCI bus number accounting, now to allow us
to attach ACPI bus numbers via ACPI. A patch to do this is below.
regards Christian
Hi Christian,
Any chance of having
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 17:01:21 +0200
From: Tobias Ulmer tobi...@tmux.org
ping?
The diff looks good to me, but I haven't had the oppurtunity to test
it yet.
*** Merci de lire ce courriel au format HTML ***
On 2012/09/20 20:16, Henning Brauer wrote:
I need your help testing. This diff has a kinda high breakage
potential, since there are quite a few output pathes. On the plus side
breakage is easy to spot, since that'll result in bad checksums and
thus these packets getting dropped. Should be all
On Sat Sep 15 2012 20:44, Norman Golisz wrote:
On Wed Sep 12 2012 10:23, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
The diff below changes GCC's default behavior to -fstack-protector-all
(i.e., add stack protection code to every function instead of just
some based on heuristics), but you can still revert to
On Sat Sep 22 2012 00:03, Norman Golisz wrote:
On Sat Sep 15 2012 20:44, Norman Golisz wrote:
On Wed Sep 12 2012 10:23, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
The diff below changes GCC's default behavior to -fstack-protector-all
(i.e., add stack protection code to every function instead of just
some
14 matches
Mail list logo
