Fixing a phrase in /stable.html

Hi, I might be nitpicking, but the sentence "This will take awhile..." at the bottom of http://www.openbsd.org/stable.html doesn't seem very grammatical to me. I'd suggest fixing it to read "...take a while...". Best regards, Nick Permyakov

Re: Fixing a phrase in /stable.html

On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 01:29:00PM +0400, Nick Permyakov wrote: > Hi, > > I might be nitpicking, but the sentence "This will take awhile..." at > the bottom of http://www.openbsd.org/stable.html doesn't seem very > grammatical to me. I'd suggest fixing it to read "...take a while...". > > Best

OpenBSD/hppa port B1000 PCI USB 2.0 bug

Hello. I've tested 3 different PCI USB 2.0 controllers on the latest snapshot but each of them has been halted during boot of the GENERIC kernel. All that controllers work fine on the different i386 platforms. chip VIA VT6212L: OpenBSD/hppa BOOT 1.2 boot> booting dk5a:/bsd: 4190208+1

Re: Fixing a phrase in /stable.html

funny enough, i took a short break from the book i'm reading to check email and read this message. returning to the book i read this sentence: "We picked the twelfth and thirteenth of July, but for awhile the issue was in some doubt." :) --patrick On Sunday, February 17, 2013, Jason McIntyre wro

OpenBSD/hppa port B1000 PCI bug during load of existing cardbus adapter driver

Hello. I've tested 2 different PCI PCMCIA/CardBus adapters known to OpenBSD with the latest snapshot GENERIC kernel but no one of them has reached operational state. Both adapters work on i386 machines. chip RICOH R5C475II: OpenBSD/hppa BOOT 1.2 boot> booting dk5a:/bsd: 4190208+1253

Re: OpenBSD/hppa port B1000 PCI bug during load of existing cardbus adapter driver

On 2/17/2013 5:29 AM, Ivan Solonin wrote: Hello. I've tested 2 different PCI PCMCIA/CardBus adapters known to OpenBSD with the latest snapshot GENERIC kernel but no one of them has reached operational state. Both adapters work on i386 machines. Is this related to the hppa page stating th

add missing semicolon to tree(3) example code

Hi all, found this still lingering in my tree. Still trying to figure out the best workflow for sending patches. Not sure if this adheres to the standards. Thanks, Franco --- share/man/man3/tree.3 | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/share/man/man3/tree.3 b/share/m

Re: add missing semicolon to tree(3) example code

On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:59:41PM +0100, Franco Fichtner wrote: > Hi all, > > found this still lingering in my tree. Still trying to figure out > the best workflow for sending patches. Not sure if this adheres > to the standards. > > Thanks, > Franco > --- > share/man/man3/tree.3 | 2 +- > 1 f

Re: add missing semicolon to tree(3) example code

On Feb 17, 2013, at 6:45 PM, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:59:41PM +0100, Franco Fichtner wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> found this still lingering in my tree. Still trying to figure out >> the best workflow for sending patches. Not sure if this adheres >> to the standards. >> >

Re: add missing semicolon to tree(3) example code

> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 18:45:10 +0100 > From: Otto Moerbeek > > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:59:41PM +0100, Franco Fichtner wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > found this still lingering in my tree. Still trying to figure out > > the best workflow for sending patches. Not sure if this adheres > > to t

Re: add missing semicolon to tree(3) example code

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:11:37AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 18:45:10 +0100 > > From: Otto Moerbeek > > > > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:59:41PM +0100, Franco Fichtner wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > found this still lingering in my tree. Still trying to figure