Re: in6_unlink_ifa: interface address has no prefix

2013-06-12 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 10/06/13(Mon) 02:05, Alexander Bluhm wrote: On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 06:34:27PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: inet 172.26.153.50 0xff00 NONE mtu 1398 in6_unlink_ifa: interface address 0x80624a00 has no prefix in6_unlink_ifa: interface address 0x80624a00 has

Re: in6_unlink_ifa: interface address has no prefix

2013-06-12 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013/06/12 12:51, Martin Pieuchot wrote: On 10/06/13(Mon) 02:05, Alexander Bluhm wrote: On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 06:34:27PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: inet 172.26.153.50 0xff00 NONE mtu 1398 in6_unlink_ifa: interface address 0x80624a00 has no prefix

Re: in6_unlink_ifa: interface address has no prefix

2013-06-12 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 12/06/13(Wed) 12:19, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2013/06/12 12:51, Martin Pieuchot wrote: On 10/06/13(Mon) 02:05, Alexander Bluhm wrote: On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 06:34:27PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: inet 172.26.153.50 0xff00 NONE mtu 1398 in6_unlink_ifa:

want to subscribe tech@openbsd.org

2013-06-12 Thread Михаил Швецов
want to subscribe tech@openbsd.org Михаил Швецов.

bge: fixup the random tx backoff seed mask

2013-06-12 Thread Mike Belopuhov
NetBSD and Broadcom docs (5718-PG106-R.pdf and 57XX-PG105-R.pdf) and even our bnx(4) driver (and it's spec) agree that the mask should be 0x3ff. OK? diff --git sys/dev/pci/if_bgereg.h sys/dev/pci/if_bgereg.h index 3685f14..c0a28b9 100644 --- sys/dev/pci/if_bgereg.h +++ sys/dev/pci/if_bgereg.h @@

Re: in6_unlink_ifa: interface address has no prefix

2013-06-12 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:19:30PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: 3. the reason for in6_unlink_ifa being called at all is because in6_ifattach_loopback automatically tries to add in6addr_loopback to a newly created lo interface, which is the wrong thing to do in the case of multiple lo(4)