I'm following Martin advice of sending just one diff, with more
explanation.
In current doing:
cd /usr/src/regress/lib/libc/locale/check_isw
sudo make
produces
./check_isw /dev/null
*** Error 1 in . (Makefile:7 'run-regress-check_isw')
FAILED
*** Error 1 in target 'regress' (ignored)
It
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org wrote:
On 2013/11/23 14:39, sven falempin wrote:
Hello,
Another point of vue :
Because curl is in base, what does ftp client add to the system ?
ftp(1) is not without problems (bad ssl support, semi-broken proxy
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.orgwrote:
On 2013/11/23 14:39, sven falempin wrote:
Hello,
Another point of vue :
Because curl is in base, what does ftp client add to the system ?
ftp(1) is not without problems (bad ssl support, semi-broken
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:11 PM, sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
wrote:
On 2013/11/23 14:39, sven falempin wrote:
Hello,
Another point of vue :
Because curl is in base, what does ftp client
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 7:29 PM, sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Andres Perera andre...@zoho.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:11 PM, sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Theo de Raadt
I'm trying to port compcert to openbsd. Here's a first patch to allow
jot to be compiled with compcert.
Wouldn't it be better to check for __STDC_VERSION__ = 199901L rather than a
list of compilers? (I don't have a source tree close by which is why I don't
have a patch.)
Supporting _Bool
Tell people the equivalent of the Command and Option keys for anyone
using a PC keyboard instead of a Mac keyboard...
Index: prep
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/src/distrib/notes/macppc/prep,v
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -p -u -r1.19
Wouldn't it be better to check for __STDC_VERSION__ = 199901L rather than a
list of compilers? (I don't have a source tree close by which is why I don't
have a patch.)
Supporting _Bool and claiming support for C99 are independent of each
other. For example gcc supports _Bool in c89 mode