Em 16-05-2014 23:48, sven falempin escreveu:
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini
> mailto:grazzol...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Em 16-05-2014 18:19, Héctor Luis Gimbatti escreveu:
> > /etc/hostname.if
> > Inet 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.0 NONE -inet6
> >
> > # ksh
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini
wrote:
> Em 16-05-2014 18:19, Héctor Luis Gimbatti escreveu:
> > /etc/hostname.if
> > Inet 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.0 NONE -inet6
> >
> > # ksh /etc/netstart
> > # ifconfig
> > ## NO PROBLEM
> >
> > /etc/hostname.if
> > Inet 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.0 -i
Em 16-05-2014 18:19, Héctor Luis Gimbatti escreveu:
> /etc/hostname.if
> Inet 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.0 NONE -inet6
>
> # ksh /etc/netstart
> # ifconfig
> ## NO PROBLEM
>
> /etc/hostname.if
> Inet 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.0 -inet6
>
> # ksh /etc/netstart
> ifconfig: -inet6: bad value
> ## NO SEGMENTATION F
/etc/hostname.if
Inet 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.0 NONE -inet6
# ksh /etc/netstart
# ifconfig
## NO PROBLEM
/etc/hostname.if
Inet 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.0 -inet6
# ksh /etc/netstart
ifconfig: -inet6: bad value
## NO SEGMENTATION FAULT
So, IMHO, if there is any problem at all, of course it should be due
Em 16-05-2014 18:15, Stuart Henderson escreveu:
> On 2014/05/16 17:26, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
>> Em 16-05-2014 17:18, Stuart Henderson escreveu:
>>> On 2014/05/16 17:12, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
As I mentioned, I'm running 5.5 stable. So this might got fixed in
current, I'm taking a
On 2014/05/16 17:26, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> Em 16-05-2014 17:18, Stuart Henderson escreveu:
> > On 2014/05/16 17:12, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> >> As I mentioned, I'm running 5.5 stable. So this might got fixed in
> >> current, I'm taking a look at the CVS commits right now to see if it was
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 05:29:10PM -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> Em 16-05-2014 17:18, Stuart Henderson escreveu:
> > On 2014/05/16 17:12, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> >> As I mentioned, I'm running 5.5 stable. So this might got fixed in
> >> current, I'm taking a look at the CVS commits right
Hi Miod,
(cc'ing tech@ to see if anybody else has one of these keyboards)
Is this the correct way to go about adding a sub-keymap to place
the VT switch commands on dedicated keys? For local use, I just
hacked up the standard keymap :-))). Likewise the necessary
changes to wskbd.c to process th
# sha256
/sbin/ifconfig
SHA256 (/sbin/ifconfig) =
e1b9688f2ebf5a278408c49ac13e35479a96b883ff9891ada141470d55a1b158
and mine does not crash.
-luis
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini
wrote:
> Em 16-05-2014 17:18, Stuart Henderson escreveu:
> > On 2014/05/16 17:12, Giancarlo R
Em 16-05-2014 17:18, Stuart Henderson escreveu:
> On 2014/05/16 17:12, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
>> As I mentioned, I'm running 5.5 stable. So this might got fixed in
>> current, I'm taking a look at the CVS commits right now to see if it was
>> fixed. But, funny thing, I've managed to get another
Em 16-05-2014 17:18, Stuart Henderson escreveu:
> On 2014/05/16 17:12, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
>> As I mentioned, I'm running 5.5 stable. So this might got fixed in
>> current, I'm taking a look at the CVS commits right now to see if it was
>> fixed. But, funny thing, I've managed to get another
On my OBSD 5.5 box I cannot reproduce:
/etc/hostname.bge0
inet 192.168.2.170 255.255.255.0 -inet6
# sh /etc/netstart
bge0
ifconfig: -inet6: bad value
OpenBSD 5.5 (GENERIC.MP) #315: Wed Mar 5 09:37:46 MST 2014
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem =
On 2014/05/16 17:12, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> As I mentioned, I'm running 5.5 stable. So this might got fixed in
> current, I'm taking a look at the CVS commits right now to see if it was
> fixed. But, funny thing, I've managed to get another segmentation fault,
> this time from command line. W
Em 16-05-2014 16:45, Kenneth Westerback escreveu:
> On 16 May 2014 15:00, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was configuring one new interface in one of my new machines, and I
>> disabled ipv6 with -inet6 as I always do. But I handcrafted the
>> hostname.if file and forgot to put a NONE
On 16 May 2014 15:00, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was configuring one new interface in one of my new machines, and I
> disabled ipv6 with -inet6 as I always do. But I handcrafted the
> hostname.if file and forgot to put a NONE in the broadcast address. This
> caused the ifconfig to
Hi,
I was configuring one new interface in one of my new machines, and I
disabled ipv6 with -inet6 as I always do. But I handcrafted the
hostname.if file and forgot to put a NONE in the broadcast address. This
caused the ifconfig to segfault when called from the /etc/netstart
script. For examp
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 02:16:10PM -0400, Jean-Philippe Ouellet wrote:
> There are a bunch of nearby printfs which start with ": ..." without
> a devname. I'm not sure which one is preferred, so here's both ways.
>
>
> Index: ehci_cardbus.c
> ==
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 20:01, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 03:28:02PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
>> As I learned the hard way not long ago, free() doesn't detect all
>> errors because of the delay mechanism. We can make two improvements.
>>
>> 1. Perform the sanity checking fr
There are a bunch of nearby printfs which start with ": ..." without
a devname. I'm not sure which one is preferred, so here's both ways.
Index: ehci_cardbus.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/cardbus/ehci_cardbus.c,v
retrieving revisi
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 03:28:02PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> As I learned the hard way not long ago, free() doesn't detect all
> errors because of the delay mechanism. We can make two improvements.
>
> 1. Perform the sanity checking from free_bytes before we insert
> something into the delay ar
On 16 May 2014 12:54, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> Currently, if you have a host netgroup with an unresolvable hostname,
> the file system will not be exported to any of the netgroup members.
> This is because we don't zero out grp before reusing it when a host
> is unresolvable.
>
> - todd
>
> Index:
Currently, if you have a host netgroup with an unresolvable hostname,
the file system will not be exported to any of the netgroup members.
This is because we don't zero out grp before reusing it when a host
is unresolvable.
- todd
Index: sbin/mountd/mountd.c
=
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 03:31:41PM +0200, ??ukasz Ratajski wrote:
> Am 16.05.2014 13:10, schrieb David Coppa:
> > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:02 PM, ??ukasz Ratajski
> > wrote:
> >> Attached is a diff for umsm+man page which enables support for the
> >> Alcatel OneTouch L100V USB 2G/3G/LTE modem, kn
On Mon, 12 May 2014, bust...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Brent Cook
>
> ---
> rc4/rc4test.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/rc4/rc4test.c b/rc4/rc4test.c
> index a0b08a6..c4d34b1 100644
> --- a/rc4/rc4test.c
> +++ b/rc4/rc4test.c
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
> #include
> #include
Thanks for the diff - I've committed a more comprehensive diff that makes it
clean with WARNINGS=Yes.
On Mon, 12 May 2014, bust...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Brent Cook
>
> ---
> base64/base64test.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/base64/base64test.c
Stefan Sperling openbsd.org> writes:
> Are you able to try your run(4) device with FreeBSD-current (10 isn't
> new enough)? They claim to support your device and use the updated
firmware.
Please take a look at my (unfinished) attempt to bring
MediaTek/Ralink RT5370/RT5372 support to run(4).
ht
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Łukasz Ratajski
wrote:
> Am 16.05.2014 13:10, schrieb David Coppa:
>> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Łukasz Ratajski
>> wrote:
>>> Attached is a diff for umsm+man page which enables support for the
>>> Alcatel OneTouch L100V USB 2G/3G/LTE modem, known in Germany
* Claudio Jeker [2014-05-16 08:06]:
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:43:52AM -0500, Todd T. Fries wrote:
> > When I travel between networks.. at home with rtsol capable networks ..
> > and at e.g. a library that does not have native IPv6 .. I find it invaluable
> > to 'zzz' then upon resume 'ifconfig
Am 16.05.2014 13:10, schrieb David Coppa:
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Łukasz Ratajski
> wrote:
>> Attached is a diff for umsm+man page which enables support for the
>> Alcatel OneTouch L100V USB 2G/3G/LTE modem, known in Germany as Telekom
>> SpeedStick LTE II.
>>
>> The storage part has to
On Fri, 16 May 2014 13:07:24 +0200 Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 02:44:10PM +0400, Dinar Talypov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have tested with D-Link DWA-140 rev B2G:
> >
> > run0 at uhub0 port 1 "Ralink 11n Adapter" rev 1.10/1.01 addr 2
> > run0: MAC/BBP RT3071 (rev 0x021C), RF
On Thu, May 15, 2014 11:35 am, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> This firmware update to version 0.33 is a prequisite for
> newer run(4) devices which are not yet supported.
>
> Can active users of run(4) devices please test this update
> to make sure no regressions are introduced for already working
> devi
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Łukasz Ratajski
wrote:
> Attached is a diff for umsm+man page which enables support for the
> Alcatel OneTouch L100V USB 2G/3G/LTE modem, known in Germany as Telekom
> SpeedStick LTE II.
>
> The storage part has to be ejected first. Connectivity tested with
> userl
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 02:44:10PM +0400, Dinar Talypov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have tested with D-Link DWA-140 rev B2G:
>
> run0 at uhub0 port 1 "Ralink 11n Adapter" rev 1.10/1.01 addr 2
> run0: MAC/BBP RT3071 (rev 0x021C), RF RT3022 (MIMO 2T2R), address
> 14:d6:4d:49:73:4e
>
> with this diff nothi
Attached is a diff for umsm+man page which enables support for the
Alcatel OneTouch L100V USB 2G/3G/LTE modem, known in Germany as Telekom
SpeedStick LTE II.
The storage part has to be ejected first. Connectivity tested with
userland ppp on amd64. Patch is against 5.5-STABLE.
umass1 at uhub0 port
Hi,
I have tested with D-Link DWA-140 rev B2G:
run0 at uhub0 port 1 "Ralink 11n Adapter" rev 1.10/1.01 addr 2
run0: MAC/BBP RT3071 (rev 0x021C), RF RT3022 (MIMO 2T2R), address
14:d6:4d:49:73:4e
with this diff nothing works. It doesn't find any access point.
2014-05-15 19:32 GMT+04:00 Fred :
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 09:53:39PM +0059, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:40:27PM +0200, Frank Brodbeck wrote:
> > Hi Jason,
> >
> > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:16:59PM +0059, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > > it's still missing some <>. also i think we can wholly simplify the
> > > au
36 matches
Mail list logo
