macppc: ld: a.out: Not enough room for program headers (allocated 12, need 13)

I've updated my powerbook to the latest snapshot today. I can't build a simple C program with the option -Wl,-z,wxneeded. The linker always shows the same error. # gcc test.c # gcc -Wl,-z,wxneeded test.c /usr/bin/ld: a.out: Not enough room for program headers (allocated 12, need 13) Section to

Re: macppc: ld: a.out: Not enough room for program headers (allocated 12, need 13)

On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > I've updated my powerbook to the latest snapshot today. I can't build a > simple C program with the option -Wl,-z,wxneeded. The linker always > shows the same error. > > # gcc test.c > # gcc -Wl,-z,wxneeded test.c > /usr/bin/ld:

Re: [Bug 63] Any user can panic the kernel with the sysctl call.

Tim Newsham wrote: > > > > I made the same change in my tree. So OK claudio@ > > > > Thank you both for the quick turnaround. Do you know if there will be an > errata for this? > We want to post this to oss-sec, but will wait until an errata is published > if one is planned. Nothing is queued

Re: macppc: ld: a.out: Not enough room for program headers (allocated 12, need 13)

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 05:30:47PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > > I've updated my powerbook to the latest snapshot today. I can't build a > > simple C program with the option -Wl,-z,wxneeded. The linker always > > shows the same

Re: macppc: ld: a.out: Not enough room for program headers (allocated 12, need 13)

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 6:48 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > Your patch fixes the problem. Thanks! Thanks for the report; it's been committed for 6.0. Philip Guenther

Re: armv7 diff for testing

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 04:26:26PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Can you show us the output of "ifconfig fec0" and "vmstat -zi"? Sure. At the bottom of the message. > Also, are you plugged into a gigabit switch? If not, "ifconfig fec0 > media 100baseTX" might help. No, cheap Fast Ethernet

Re: Hyper-V protection fault trap on i386 with 5.9

> On 22 Jul 2016, at 7:58 PM, Mike Larkin wrote: > > What is your Hyper-V server host environment? Server 2012 R2? And I > need a full dmesg from when this worked, please. It's a Windows Server 2012 Datacenter Hyper-V failover cluster, controlled by System Center 2012

hotplugd restart problem

Hi! If something is running which is started from attach script, restarting of hotplugd fails because /dev/hotplug is occupied by child process. Attached is the patch to fix this problem. Index: usr.sbin/hotplugd/hotplugd.c === RCS

Re: hotplugd restart problem

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 02:17:11PM +0300, Alexey Vatchenko wrote: > Hi! > If something is running which is started from attach script, restarting of > hotplugd fails because /dev/hotplug is occupied by child process. > > Attached is the patch to fix this problem. Makes sense, but why not pass

Re: armv7 kernel load address

> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 23:35:05 +0200 > From: Patrick Wildt > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 12:05:57AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Currently armv7 kernels expect to be loaded at the bottom of physical > > ram. The diff below removes this restriction. > > > > This is

Re: armv7 diff for testing

> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:58:09 -0300 > From: Daniel Bolgheroni > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 01:06:50PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > > > Actually the pad configuration in those commits may mean this isn't > > enough. > > Hi, > > I saw the r1.9 for if_fec.c and then

jot(1) bugs, test suite

Hi tech@, After the recent discussion on jot I noticed there were no tests for it. I looked around and saw that FreeBSD had what looked like decent jot tests, so I brought them into my tree. They appear to have discovered a couple of bugs and I'd like some help in sorting it out. The current

Re: [Bug 63] Any user can panic the kernel with the sysctl call.

> > I made the same change in my tree. So OK claudio@ > Thank you both for the quick turnaround. Do you know if there will be an errata for this? We want to post this to oss-sec, but will wait until an errata is published if one is planned. -- Tim Newsham | www.thenewsh.com/~newsham |

Re: jot(1) bugs, test suite

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 01:26:51PM -0500, attila wrote: > Hi tech@, > > After the recent discussion on jot I noticed there were no tests for > it. I looked around and saw that FreeBSD had what looked like decent > jot tests, so I brought them into my tree. They appear to have > discovered a