On 2017-01-29, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>>> which allows us to fully comply with the V4L2 API. The attached diff
>>> implements this and syncs with videodev2.h from the Linux kernel version
>>> 4.10-rc5 at the same time
>>
>> This needs to go in a bulk since most users of
If fw_loadpage fails, the size passed to free(9) is bogus. Always pass
the size returned by load_firmware instead. I hit this a few days ago,
ok?
Index: rtwn.c
===
RCS file: /d/cvs/src/sys/dev/ic/rtwn.c,v
retrieving revision 1.12
An 11n athn hostap will currently apply HT protection (RTS) even when
sending frames to a non-11n client which does not need such protection.
This is causing unnecessary overhead.
It happens because the wrong flag is checked by the driver:
IEEE80211_F_HTON tells us if 11n is supported by the
Hi,
when I first imported the new C++ stack with libc++, libc++abi and
libunwind I wanted to find out if we really needed libc++abi as a
shared library or not. Thus so far only libc++ is a shared object,
while libc++abi is only provided as .a. My reasoning was that the
ABI should never change,
On 10:47 Sun 29 Jan , Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 05:26:05PM +0100, Imre Vadász wrote:
> > Hi,
> > This patch updates the struct iwm_scan_results_notif to FW Api version 3,
> > and removes the unused enum iwm_scan_complete_status status codes, as well
> > as the
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 03:28:21PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>
> If fw_loadpage fails, the size passed to free(9) is bogus. Always pass
> the size returned by load_firmware instead. I hit this a few days ago,
> ok?
ok stsp@
> Index: rtwn.c
>
The rtwn driver never tells hardware about the short slot time
and short preamble features enabled by most APs (since 11g).
Not sure if not doing so hurts but the linux driver does it.
Tested on:
8188CE (PCI)
8192CU (USB)
8188EU (USB)
8188CUS (USB)
ok?
Index: rtwn.c
EDCA ("Enhanced distributed channel access") was first introduced
in 802.11e and is also part of 802.11n.
Essentially, these parameters define how frame transmissions are timed.
They are not necessary to operate in pure 11a/b/g networks, but 11n clients
will typically pass these parameters to
Jonathan Gray wrote:
> Base gcc4 changes the defaults to set -Wno-pointer-sign.
> Base clang does not, I'm not sure where in the llvm code to do so.
> Base gcc3 does not handle -Wno-pointer-sign.
I think this should turn off -Wpointer-sign off by default.
Passing -Wpointer-sign on the command
Very lightly tested. I used the existing percpu counters as examples.
I don't like the hardcoding of "32" in ip6_input() but I am not sure how
to solve it nicely; the easiest way would be to just kill those
ipv6-specific mbuf stats. Would anyone miss them?
Mbuf statistics:
Hello -
The following diff adds free sizes to free() calls in uvm/. Only one
remaining in uvm/.
Index: uvm/uvm_amap.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/uvm/uvm_amap.c,v
retrieving revision 1.78
diff -u -p -r1.78 uvm_amap.c
---
This cleans up the code which handles EDCA parameters in rtwn/urtwn.
The driver now gets its EDCA params from net80211 instead of hardcoding them.
There's a bit of a layer violation since the driver writes to ic->ic_edca_ac
because net80211 does not fill it in yet.
I think net80211 should do
On 25.1.2017. 7:32, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> I just enabled the NET_LOCK() again and I'm looking for test reports.
> Please go build a kernel from sources or wait for the next snapshot,
> run it and report back.
>
> If you're looking for some small coding tasks related to the NET_LOCK()
> just
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 18:38:12 -0500, Daniel Jakots
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When following the example from the OpenSMTPD faq [0], first thing is
> to create a new user with:
>
> useradd -g =uid -c "Virtual Mail" -d /var/vmail -s /sbin/nologin vmail
>
> which raises
>
Hi,
When following the example from the OpenSMTPD faq [0], first thing is to
create a new user with:
useradd -g =uid -c "Virtual Mail" -d /var/vmail -s /sbin/nologin vmail
which raises
warnx("Warning: home directory `%s' doesn't exist, and -m was"
" not specified", home);
I don't think
Hi, I've also ran into this.
Reported here [1] (a new email with some more stack traces should be
landing soon).
BR,
Pedro Caetano
[1] https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs=148581520804370=2
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:12 PM, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 25.1.2017. 7:32, Martin
CTASSERT is more useful when the result of the test is known at compile
time. Build-tested on amd64 and armv7, ok?
Index: net/rtsock.c
===
RCS file: /d/cvs/src/sys/net/rtsock.c,v
retrieving revision 1.220
diff -u -p -r1.220
ok.
> On 31 Jan 2017, at 10:41, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>
>
> CTASSERT is more useful when the result of the test is known at compile
> time. Build-tested on amd64 and armv7, ok?
>
>
> Index: net/rtsock.c
>
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 07:00:18PM -0500, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 18:38:12 -0500, Daniel Jakots
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > When following the example from the OpenSMTPD faq [0], first thing is
> > to create a new user with:
> >
> > useradd -g =uid -c
Stefan Sperling writes:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 07:49:56AM +0200, Timo Myyrä wrote:
>> Hmm, I've been running the 11n for a while and it seems to be a lot slower
>> than
>> 11g for me. Just did quick benchmark using tcpbench between OpenBSD hostAP
>> (athn) and
>> laptop
20 matches
Mail list logo