anyone?
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 09:31:26AM +, Florian Obser wrote:
>
> Rename in6_get_rand_ifi() to get_last_resort_ifid() and delete the old
> get_last_resort_ifid() function because eww.
> Also if your system is so constraint that you end up in
> get_last_resort_ifid() you don't deserve a
The ASN1_time_tm_clamp_notafter function does nothing except when
the portable-only SMALL_TIME_T define has been enabled.
However, the SMALL_TIME_T functionality also needs to be accessed
by the libtls tls_get_peer_cert_times function in order for the
portable build of libtls to also support
The tls_get_peer_cert_times function returns a certificate's notAfter
date as a time_t value.
Make use of the ASN1_time_tm_clamp_notafter function so that when
SMALL_TIME_T has been defined for a portable build tls_get_peer_cert_times
does not fail when it would otherwise succeed.
Signed-off-by:
Thank you.
I have applied the change to the latest LibreSSL portable tarball and
tested it.
With the new define (SMALL_TIME_T) enabled, a 32-bit time_t build
using "openssl s_client -connect" can successfully connect to a server
and verify its certificate chain when one or more notAfter
Few weeks bump.
Any feedback on this fabulous Scott Cheloha/ingo@ collaboration?
Slightly re-tweaked patch below; while here:
kill(getpid(), sig) -> raise(sig)
I didn't even know there was a raise(3) function until this weekend,
they really did think of everything.
--
Scott Cheloha
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 12:24:20AM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> With the atf-allwinner port and u-boot patch on ports@ we can now build
> and include an open firmware for the Pine64 without boot0.
>
> The arm64 snapshot for the 19th of August includes an older version of
> this patch which
Hi,
i think i saw this done similarly in some other driver, and thought why not,
but i'm unsure about the needs-flag in files.x?
-Artturi
diff --git a/sys/arch/arm64/dev/bcm2835_dwctwo.c
b/sys/arch/arm64/dev/bcm2835_dwctwo.c
index d6cfe61fd2a..9242e9ea65e 100644
---
> Does it make sense to move ctfstrip and ctfconv to base?
Yes, they should be in base.
On Sun 20/08/2017 14:20, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
> I just upgraded my machine to a newer snapshot. Unfortunately the kernel
> relinking bit failed. Root cause is that strip has been replaced by ctfstrip,
> which is part of the comp set, which I have not installed.
>
> The exact same thing happened
I just upgraded my machine to a newer snapshot. Unfortunately the kernel
relinking bit failed. Root cause is that strip has been replaced by ctfstrip,
which is part of the comp set, which I have not installed.
The exact same thing happened when strip was part of the comp set. Solution
then was
10 matches
Mail list logo