Re: MSI-X fix

2019-05-30 Thread Jonathan Matthew
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 08:25:39PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > I started implementing MSI-X support for arm64 adn tried to use re(4) > for testing. This failed miserably and when I tried to use MSI-X with > re(4) on amd64 I noticed it didn't work either. > > Turns out the Realtek hardware

Re: vmd(8) i8042 device implementation questions

2019-05-30 Thread Katherine Rohl
Apologies. --- diff --git a/sys/arch/amd64/amd64/vmm.c b/sys/arch/amd64/amd64/vmm.c index 4ffb2ff899f..7de38facc78 100644 --- a/sys/arch/amd64/amd64/vmm.c +++ b/sys/arch/amd64/amd64/vmm.c @@ -5359,6 +5359,8 @@ svm_handle_inout(struct vcpu *vcpu) case IO_ICU1 ... IO_ICU1 + 1: case

Re: vmd(8) i8042 device implementation questions

2019-05-30 Thread Katherine Rohl
Ah, OK. This should follow style(9): — Ah, OK. This should follow style(9): --- diff --git a/sys/arch/amd64/amd64/vmm.c b/sys/arch/amd64/amd64/vmm.c index 4ffb2ff899f..7de38facc78 100644 --- a/sys/arch/amd64/amd64/vmm.c +++ b/sys/arch/amd64/amd64/vmm.c @@ -5359,6 +5359,8 @@

Re: MSI-X fix

2019-05-30 Thread Mike Larkin
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 08:25:39PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > I started implementing MSI-X support for arm64 adn tried to use re(4) > for testing. This failed miserably and when I tried to use MSI-X with > re(4) on amd64 I noticed it didn't work either. > > Turns out the Realtek hardware

Re: vmd(8) i8042 device implementation questions

2019-05-30 Thread Bryan Steele
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 12:09:01AM -0500, Katherine Rohl wrote: > Okay, here's the first pass of my 8042 device - I wasn't able to figure out > how to tie the reset line to the guest VM reset, so I was hoping someone > could give me a hand with that. Other than that, it attaches to i386 and >

Re: bgpd fix duplicate network check

2019-05-30 Thread Sebastian Benoit
ok Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2019.05.29 07:25:59 +0200: > The check if a network is already present is slightly wrong since it does > not check the type. I triggered it with: > > network inet static > network 0.0.0.0/0 > > Fix is trivial. > -- > :wq Claudio > > Index: parse.y

Re: MSI-X fix

2019-05-30 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 12:43:17 -0700 > From: Mike Larkin > > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 08:25:39PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > I started implementing MSI-X support for arm64 adn tried to use re(4) > > for testing. This failed miserably and when I tried to use MSI-X with > > re(4) on amd64 I

Re: [patch] replace 'php5' with 'php' in ports(7)

2019-05-30 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Thu, May 30 2019, Jesper Wallin wrote: > Hi all, > > Replace the reference of 'php5' with 'php' in ports(7) since 'php5' is > deprecated and no longer exists in the ports tree. Committed, thanks. > Jesper Wallin > > > Index: share/man/man7/ports.7 >

[patch] replace 'php5' with 'php' in ports(7)

2019-05-30 Thread Jesper Wallin
Hi all, Replace the reference of 'php5' with 'php' in ports(7) since 'php5' is deprecated and no longer exists in the ports tree. Jesper Wallin Index: share/man/man7/ports.7 === RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man7/ports.7,v

MSI-X fix

2019-05-30 Thread Mark Kettenis
I started implementing MSI-X support for arm64 adn tried to use re(4) for testing. This failed miserably and when I tried to use MSI-X with re(4) on amd64 I noticed it didn't work either. Turns out the Realtek hardware doesn't support 64-bit access to MSI-X table. Reads return