Diff below split uvm(9) into the following:
- uvm_init(9)
- uvm_fault(9)
- uvm_km_alloc(9)
- uvm_map(9)
- uvm_pagealloc(9)
- uvn_attach(9)
That will allow us to work on smaller pages and improve the overall
documentation of UVM.
This split doesn't include changes.
Ok?
Index: Makefile
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 01:55:00PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Diff below split uvm(9) into the following:
>
> - uvm_init(9)
> - uvm_fault(9)
> - uvm_km_alloc(9)
> - uvm_map(9)
> - uvm_pagealloc(9)
> - uvn_attach(9)
>
> That will allow us to work on smaller pages and improve the overall
>
Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > + uvn_attach.9 \
>
> uv*m*_attach
nope, it is correct. uvm object to vnode attach.
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 06:06:55AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Jason McIntyre wrote:
>
> > > + uvn_attach.9 \
> >
> > uv*m*_attach
>
> nope, it is correct. uvm object to vnode attach.
>
oops, sorry!
Hi,
I read https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/12/04/5 and wondered
how the authentication bypass was possible, since the manpage says:
If this style of authentication does not support challenge response, but
does support the response service (described below) it should
Hi Jason,
Jason McIntyre wrote on Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 06:54:28AM -0700:
> CVSROOT: /cvs
> Module name: src
> Changes by: j...@cvs.openbsd.org2019/12/05 06:54:28
>
> Modified files:
> usr.sbin/smtpd : smtpd.conf.5
>
> Log message:
> replace "Pf < ... Ns >" with Aq; tidy up
Hi Martin,
Martin Pieuchot wrote on Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 01:55:00PM +0100:
> Diff below split uvm(9) into the following:
>
> - uvm_init(9)
> - uvm_fault(9)
> - uvm_km_alloc(9)
> - uvm_map(9)
> - uvm_pagealloc(9)
> - uvn_attach(9)
Yes please!
In particular, i like how this reduces usage of .nr
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 03:15:31PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> Jason McIntyre wrote on Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 06:54:28AM -0700:
>
> > CVSROOT:/cvs
> > Module name:src
> > Changes by: j...@cvs.openbsd.org2019/12/05 06:54:28
> >
> > Modified files:
> >
On 05/12/19(Thu) 11:57, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 12:38:34PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>
> > ok?
>
> I'm no kernel hacker but I really do not see the point.
Most of the kernel doesn't use any type for boolean. The exception is
UVM which uses its own boolean_t. This
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 04:12:01PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 05/12/19(Thu) 11:57, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 12:38:34PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> >
> > > ok?
> >
> > I'm no kernel hacker but I really do not see the point.
>
> Most of the kernel doesn't use
Hi Jason,
Jason McIntyre wrote on Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 02:54:20PM +:
> i have reverted it, with a heavy heart.
Do you think i should try and convince the groff folks to always
render .Aq/.Ao/.Ac as ASCII '<' and '>', even in UTF-8, HTML, PDF
output and the like?
Benefits:
+ easier rules
December 5, 2019 4:34 PM, "Ingo Schwarze" wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> Jason McIntyre wrote on Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 02:54:20PM +:
>
>> i have reverted it, with a heavy heart.
>
> Do you think i should try and convince the groff folks to always
> render .Aq/.Ao/.Ac as ASCII '<' and '>', even in
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 04:34:50PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> Jason McIntyre wrote on Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 02:54:20PM +:
>
> > i have reverted it, with a heavy heart.
>
> Do you think i should try and convince the groff folks to always
> render .Aq/.Ao/.Ac as ASCII '<' and
We send certificate request (CERTREQ) payloads to notify the peer which CAs or
public key schemes we accept in the authentication.
Our current behaviour is incorrect when multiple policies between the same two
hosts use different kinds of raw public key authentication.
At this point of the
Sync with reality, will help KERN_PROC_VMMAP consumers. Ok?
Index: sys/sysctl.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/sys/sysctl.h,v
retrieving revision 1.196
diff -u -p -r1.196 sysctl.h
--- sys/sysctl.h22 Oct 2019 21:19:22 -
Following cleanup diff:
- reduces gratuitous differences with NetBSD,
- merges multiple '#ifdef _KERNEL' blocks,
- kills unused 'struct vm_map_intrsafe'
- turns 'union vm_map_object' into a anonymous union (following to NetBSD)
- move questionable vm_map_modflags() into uvm/uvm_map.c
- remove
vm.conf(5) states it must be `owner user[:group]' or `owner group', not
specifying a value is undocumented and ought to be invalid syntax, yet
`owner' is treated as `owner root' which is the same as simply omitting
the owner line.
Diff below causes the following behaviour change:
$ cat
Hey!
Some cross references in the {MD5,SHA1,RMD160}Init(3) pages are
misspelled.
Best,
Martin
Index: MD5Init.3
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/hash/MD5Init.3,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1 MD5Init.3
--- MD5Init.3 30
Hello,
here a diff replacing www.google.com as a default time constraint by
www.openbsd.org.
It is claimed that OpenBSD would have sane and secure defaults. While
www.google.com might be secure it ain't sane from a privacy concerned
perspective. Therefore the diff.
Regards,
Stephan
Index:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 10:18:14PM +0100, Martin wrote:
> Hey!
>
> Some cross references in the {MD5,SHA1,RMD160}Init(3) pages are
> misspelled.
>
> Best,
>
> Martin
>
fixed, thanks.
jmc
> Index: MD5Init.3
> ===
> RCS file:
I guess you don't understand what is going on there.
List wrote:
> Hello,
>
> here a diff replacing www.google.com as a default time constraint by
> www.openbsd.org.
> It is claimed that OpenBSD would have sane and secure defaults. While
> www.google.com might be secure it ain't sane from a
Hello,
After reviewing the source code available at the below URL I believe the
'-N' flag does not have an ssh_config counterpart.
Can this be added? Is it something I can add?
https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/blob/a70d92f236576c032a45c39e68ca0d71e958d19d/ssh.c
Tareq Saif
*Computer
> On 5 Dec 2019, at 21:14, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
>
> Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2019.12.05 09:53:49 +0100:
>> I would suggest to just pack most of the headers into one group of ().
>>
>> IPv4 ttl 1 [tos 0x20] 10.0.127.15 > 10.0.127.1
>> would become
>> IPv4 (ttl 1 tos 0x20)
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 9:15 AM Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Sync with reality, will help KERN_PROC_VMMAP consumers. Ok?
>
ok guenther@
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 03:14:42PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>
>
> > On 5 Dec 2019, at 21:14, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> >
> > Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2019.12.05 09:53:49 +0100:
> >> I would suggest to just pack most of the headers into one group of ().
> >>
> >> IPv4 ttl 1
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 10:00:01PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> this is a significant reworking of tcpdump with a couple of goals
> twisted together.
>
> it is becoming increasingly common to encapsulate protocols, leading
> to situations where you have some kind of ip packet inside another
> ip
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 12:38:34PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> ok?
I'm no kernel hacker but I really do not see the point.
boolean_t helps to see if a functions is supposed to return a boolean
instead of an error code. I hate reading a function and having to
guess if 0 is supposed to mean
On Wed, Dec 04 2019, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> ftp(1) built with no TLS support is confused (confusing?) when handled
> an https url. I have noticed this during tests with
> /usr/src/distrib/special/ftp.
>
> Now:
> --8<--
> ritchie /usr/src/distrib/special/ftp$ obj/ftp -o/dev/null
>
Convert them to {m,t}sleep_nsec(9), ok?
Index: uvm/uvm_device.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/uvm/uvm_device.c,v
retrieving revision 1.56
diff -u -p -r1.56 uvm_device.c
--- uvm/uvm_device.c18 Jul 2019 23:47:33 - 1.56
+++
Claudio Jeker(cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com) on 2019.12.05 09:53:49 +0100:
> I would suggest to just pack most of the headers into one group of ().
>
> IPv4 ttl 1 [tos 0x20] 10.0.127.15 > 10.0.127.1
> would become
> IPv4 (ttl 1 tos 0x20) 10.0.127.15 > 10.0.127.1
> and
> IPv4 ttl 1 [tos 0x20] (id
ok
George Brown(321.geo...@gmail.com) on 2019.12.04 18:57:17 +:
> After pledge is immediately called without the unveil promise so this
> seems redundant.
>
> diff --git a/usr.sbin/rpki-client/main.c b/usr.sbin/rpki-client/main.c
> index f05ec1c5837..53ee4223371 100644
> ---
On Wed, Nov 06 2019, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
[...]
> Thanks for reviewing the patch. Sadly I noticed and made a stupid mistake.
> When
> NOSSL is set, but SMALL is not set. It will set scheme = HTTPS_URL for the
> file handler.
>
> Below is the full updated patch:
I think we don't want to
Convert them to tsleep_nsec(9), ok?
Index: kern/vfs_bio.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c,v
retrieving revision 1.193
diff -u -p -r1.193 vfs_bio.c
--- kern/vfs_bio.c 29 Nov 2019 01:04:08 - 1.193
+++
Klemens Nanni(k...@openbsd.org) on 2019.11.30 01:44:48 +0100:
> Just like on amd64 with vmctl(8), I want to be able to easily create
> disk images.
>
> ldomctl(8) currently advises to use dd(1), those files are not sparse
> either so creating big images may take a lot of time and the process
>
ok?
Index: i386/pmap.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/i386/i386/pmap.c,v
retrieving revision 1.204
diff -u -p -r1.204 pmap.c
--- i386/pmap.c 18 Jan 2019 01:34:50 - 1.204
+++ i386/pmap.c 5 Dec 2019 11:23:20 -
@@ -403,7
35 matches
Mail list logo
