On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 20:40:10 -0600
"Theo de Raadt" wrote:
> Matt Dunwoodie wrote:
>
> > Depends on your definition of significant, I've seen 1-3% throughput
> > improvement without the patch.
>
> > Real networks require statistics, which you want to throw away.
>
> > Overall, it is still
Matt Dunwoodie wrote:
> Depends on your definition of significant, I've seen 1-3% throughput
> improvement without the patch.
> Real networks require statistics, which you want to throw away.
> Overall, it is still debatable whether to skip the IPv4 checksum as
> modern crypto certainly offers
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 09:22:18 +1200 (NZST)
richard.n.proc...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> On 27/06/2020, at 10:09 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld
> wrote:
> > [...] I thought I'd lay out my understanding of the matter,
> > and you can let me know whether or not this corresponds with what
> > you had
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 03:48:22PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 12:08:03PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 29/06/20(Mon) 11:59, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > I reworked tool for reproduce. Now I avoided fork()/exec() route and it
> > > takes couple
Without any later realloactions, size is taken from vdsk_dring_alloc():
struct vdisk_dring *vd;
...
vd = malloc(sizeof(struct vdsk_dring), M_DEVBUF, M_NOWAIT);
Tested on T4-2 guest domains, altough that of course just means that
allocating rings keeps working as before
Without any later realloactions, size is taken from vnet_dring_alloc():
struct vnet_dring *vd;
...
vd = malloc(sizeof(struct vnet_dring), M_DEVBUF, M_NOWAIT);
Tested on T4-2 guest domains:
vnet0 at cbus0 chan 0x6: ivec 0xc, 0xd, address 00:14:4f:f9:3f:34
`udpcksum' declared but not used in net/pipex.c, so kill it
Index: sys/net/pipex.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/pipex.c,v
retrieving revision 1.116
diff -u -p -r1.116 pipex.c
--- sys/net/pipex.c 22 Jun 2020 09:38:15 -
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 12:08:03PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 29/06/20(Mon) 11:59, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > [...]
> > I reworked tool for reproduce. Now I avoided fork()/exec() route and it
> > takes couple of minutes to take panic on 4 cores. Also some screenshots
> > attached.
>
>
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 04:30:24PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> `udpcksum' declared but not used in net/pipex.c, so kill it
OK claudio@
> Index: sys/net/pipex.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/pipex.c,v
> retrieving revision
OK kn with the manual's synopsis (`man -h rpki-client') updated as well.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:33:21AM +, Job Snijders wrote:
> Remove rpki-client's -f command line option
>
> I haven't come across a use case that requires tricking the software
> into accepting out-of-date manifests. Anyone using -f? I think this is a
> leftover from the initial debugging
Remove rpki-client's -f command line option
I haven't come across a use case that requires tricking the software
into accepting out-of-date manifests. Anyone using -f? I think this is a
leftover from the initial debugging era.
OK?
Index: extern.h
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 04:11:59AM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Interface groups are allocated as follows:
>
> struct ifg_group *
> if_creategroup(const char *groupname)
> {
> struct ifg_group*ifg;
>
> if ((ifg = malloc(sizeof(*ifg), M_TEMP,
On 29/06/20(Mon) 11:59, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> [...]
> I reworked tool for reproduce. Now I avoided fork()/exec() route and it
> takes couple of minutes to take panic on 4 cores. Also some screenshots
> attached.
Setting kern.pool_debug=2 makes the race reproducible in seconds.
Could you
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 09:22:18AM +1200, richard.n.proc...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> On 27/06/2020, at 10:09 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > [...] I thought I'd lay out my understanding of the matter,
> > and you can let me know whether or not this corresponds with what you
> > had
15 matches
Mail list logo
