On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 07:40:26PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 09:05:24AM +, Visa Hankala wrote:
> > When a CPU starts processing a soft interrupt, it reserves the handler
> > to prevent concurrent execution. If the soft interrupt gets rescheduled
> > during
This patch attempts to implement Tx aggregation support for iwx(4).
It is not yet ready to be committed because of outstanding problems:
- Under load the firmware throws a fatal firmware error every few minutes.
- Starting a background scan under load can cause firmware errors and
might error
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 04:48:39AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> >
> > Feedback? OK?
>
> You have two overlong lines as indicated below. I would have thought
> that mandoc -Tlint complains about that, but apparently it doesn't have
> such a warning... With those wrapped,
>
yes, there is no
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:26:41PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
>
> Thanks. tls_config_add_*_file also load files into memory, but given
> this patch I think their usage of "add" in the manual is enough to infer
> that files will also be loaded and added, so no need to change those as
> well, I
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 02:59:19AM +0200, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> >
> > as above, copyout with a sleeping lock is fine.
> >
> > the whole point of my change is to give us the ability to lock in the
> > forwarding path separately to locking in the ioctl path. half of that is
>
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:26:41PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 09:32:36PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 03:34:39PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 10:26:15PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > > > tls_config_set_ca_file(3)
Index: uplcom.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/usb/uplcom.c,v
retrieving revision 1.77
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.77 uplcom.c
--- uplcom.c27 Jan 2021 17:28:19 - 1.77
+++ uplcom.c19 Jun 2021 19:25:50 -
@@ -162,6 +162,7
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 03:19:11PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 10:09:47AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Could you annotate which field is being protected by the KERNEL_LOCK()?
>
> No. I do not want to invest into fine grained crypto locking. I
> need a stable
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 09:32:36PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 03:34:39PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 10:26:15PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > > tls_config_set_ca_file(3) and tls_config_set_cert_file(3) do not just
> > > set the file paths
I updated my patch. I see `struct gmonparam` must be same between the kernel and
kgmon(1). I deleted #ifndef in the `struct gmonparam`.
Is it OK?
diff --git a/lib/libc/gmon/gmon.c b/lib/libc/gmon/gmon.c
index 1ce0a1c289e..6887f4f5987 100644
--- a/lib/libc/gmon/gmon.c
+++ b/lib/libc/gmon/gmon.c
10 matches
Mail list logo