On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 07:20:21PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 03:59:34PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > This is something I wanted to do for a while. Switch from u_intXY_t to
> > uintXY_t from stdint.h. The diff is mostly mechanical and was done with
> > sed -i
ok
On Sat, 5 Feb 2022, 01:08 Claudio Jeker, wrote:
> This is something I wanted to do for a while. Switch from u_intXY_t to
> uintXY_t from stdint.h. The diff is mostly mechanical and was done with
> sed -i 's/u_intX_t/uintX_t/g' but uint8_t changes the tab spacing and so
> I had a look over
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 11:39:50PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 10:22:46PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> > bpf should know better than this. it has all the information it needs to
> > align the payload properly, it just doesnt make enough of an effort. can
> > you try the
as discussed in "m_pullup alingment crash armv7 sparc64", at worst it
doesnt hurt to have m_pullup maintain the data alignment of payloads,
and at best it will encourage aligned loads even if the arch allows
unaligned accesses. aligned loads are faster than unaligned.
ok?
Index: uipc_mbuf.c
It was pointed out to Claudio that rpki-client does not enforce
certificate policies.
The diff below does that. It has two parts.
In cert.c we check that the certificate policy extension matches the
specification in RFC 6487, section 4.8.9, as amended by RFC 7318
section 2. That's maybe a bit
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 07:32:52PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> as discussed in "m_pullup alingment crash armv7 sparc64", at worst it
> doesnt hurt to have m_pullup maintain the data alignment of payloads,
> and at best it will encourage aligned loads even if the arch allows
> unaligned accesses.
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 12:03:41PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 10:41:03AM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > It was pointed out to Claudio that rpki-client does not enforce
> > certificate policies.
> >
> > The diff below does that. It has two parts.
> >
> > In cert.c we
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 03:56:18PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 12:03:41PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 10:41:03AM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > > It was pointed out to Claudio that rpki-client does not enforce
> > > certificate policies.
> > >
On 04/02/22(Fri) 03:39, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> [...]
> ... with the lock grabbed in uvm_map_teardown() that is, otherwise
> the first call path can lock against itself (regress/misc/posixtestsuite
> is a reproduce for this):
>
> vm_map_lock_read_ln+0x38
> uvm_fault_unwire+0x58
>
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 07:27:38PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 11:39:50PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 10:22:46PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> > > bpf should know better than this. it has all the information it needs to
> > > align the payload
On illumos sun is defined by some header so better not use sun as a
variable name. Rename variable to sa_un to reduce hacks in -portable.
--
:wq Claudio
Index: bgpctl/bgpctl.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/bgpctl/bgpctl.c,v
Ok
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022, 21:19 Claudio Jeker, wrote:
> On illumos sun is defined by some header so better not use sun as a
> variable name. Rename variable to sa_un to reduce hacks in -portable.
>
> --
> :wq Claudio
>
> Index: bgpctl/bgpctl.c
>
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 05:26:01PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 11:05:51AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 01:29:42AM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > There were some problems with ix(4) and ixl(4) hardware checksumming
> > >
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 11:39:56AM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 07:32:52PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> > as discussed in "m_pullup alingment crash armv7 sparc64", at worst it
> > doesnt hurt to have m_pullup maintain the data alignment of payloads,
> > and at best it
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 10:41:03AM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> It was pointed out to Claudio that rpki-client does not enforce
> certificate policies.
>
> The diff below does that. It has two parts.
>
> In cert.c we check that the certificate policy extension matches the
> specification in RFC
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 03:59:34PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> This is something I wanted to do for a while. Switch from u_intXY_t to
> uintXY_t from stdint.h. The diff is mostly mechanical and was done with
> sed -i 's/u_intX_t/uintX_t/g' but uint8_t changes the tab spacing and so
> I had a
How do people feel about shipping the minimal UBSan runtime library[1]
in the base system? It takes very little to build (Makefile + a few
ifdefs that both jca@ and I hacked together). The library is tiny and
useful enough for finding UB in base.
% ls -l
17 matches
Mail list logo