spamd issues

2009-06-28 Thread Wolfgang Hennerbichler
Hi, I recently put my first spamd installation into production and am quite impressed with the results, good work, folks. Nevertheless I have some questions: * it seems that when spamd scans it's database in /var/db/spamd (which is currently ~160MB of size) it doesn't accept any new

Re: cwm - unmaximizing a widnow moves it back, too

2009-06-28 Thread Thomas Pfaff
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 07:19:48 -0400 Okan Demirmen o...@demirmen.com wrote: On Mon 2009.06.15 at 11:46 +0200, Jan Stary wrote: This is 4.5-stable. In cwm, I use the C-M-f feature to toggle the full-screen size of a window (mostly xterms). That works. However, if I maximize a window with

[auto-reply] En cong�s

2009-06-28 Thread Frederic Coudy
Bonjour, Je suis en congis du lundi 22 juin au lundi 6 juillet inclus. Voici la liste des personnes ` contacter durant mon absence : Laurent Cantone 04 97 12 87 96 et Antoine Louis 01 58 96 62 73. Merci de systimatiquement utiliser la mailing liste suivante :

Re: New installer - initial user creation

2009-06-28 Thread Thomas Pfaff
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:09:27 + Thordur I. Bjornsson t...@foo.is wrote: viq v...@viq.ath.cx wrote on Fri 26.Jun'09 at 14:45:04 +0200 Since the user created during installation is somewhat marketed as root replacement, shouldn't he be added to staff login class ? Yes, I'd actually love

Re: spamd issues

2009-06-28 Thread olli hauer
Hi, I recently put my first spamd installation into production and am quite impressed with the results, good work, folks. Nevertheless I have some questions: * it seems that when spamd scans it's database in /var/db/spamd (which is currently ~160MB of size) it doesn't accept any new

Re: mixerctl broken for sparc?

2009-06-28 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 05:07:58PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: Hi, On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Jacob Meuserjake...@sdf.lonestar.org wrote: Any clues what may be wrong here? I am willing to have a look at the code myself if no-one has any ideas. please do ;) ?the mixer interface in

Re: mixerctl broken for sparc?

2009-06-28 Thread Edd Barrett
Hi Jacob, On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 04:50:41PM +, Jacob Meuser wrote: the audio codec is the same. the bus architecture differs. cs4231(4) uses sbus while ce4231(4) uses ebus. I can't send a diff, as my disk died. Hopefully new one on the way soon. I can describe what I have gathered so

Project Management Professional إحتراف إدارة المشاريع

2009-06-28 Thread مركز الجيتاوي
X(X3Y X'YYY X'YX1X-YY X'YX1X-Y Y X9YX'Y X) X'YX3X'X/X) X'YYX/X1X'X! X'YX*YYY X0Y Y Y YX'YX1X$X3X'X! Y X#X5X-X'X( X'YYX1X'X1X X*X-Y X) X7Y X(X) Y X(X9X/X YX8X1X' YYX'X2YX) X'YYX'YY X) X'YX9X'YYY X) X'YX*Y X*X9X5Y X(X'YYX$X3X3X'X* Y X'YX4X1YX'X* YY

Re: mixerctl broken for sparc?

2009-06-28 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 07:35:07PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: Hi Jacob, On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 04:50:41PM +, Jacob Meuser wrote: the audio codec is the same. the bus architecture differs. cs4231(4) uses sbus while ce4231(4) uses ebus. I can't send a diff, as my disk died.