Re: kernel make file doesn't have dependency for bsd for the install target
Han Boetes wrote on Sunday, October 18, 2009 1:51 PM Hi, I just ran tried to install the kernel and ran: make depend make install Since I forgot running make and since there is no dependency for bsd the target removed my old kernel without installing the new one. I'm not a developer, and I don't speak for them, but I suspect that install does not depend on bsd for specific reasons. First guess, as make takes a while to run, and make install is meant to be followed immediately with '#shutdown -r now', make install is not meant to be used in a 'batch'. I doubt that a dependency on any of the kernels built with make will be added. Anathae
Re: kernel make file doesn't have dependency for bsd for the install target
Anathae E. Townsend wrote: Han Boetes wrote on Sunday, October 18, 2009 1:51 PM I'm not a developer, and I don't speak for them, but I suspect that install does not depend on bsd for specific reasons. First guess, as make takes a while to run, and make install is meant to be followed immediately with '#shutdown -r now', make install is not meant to be used in a 'batch'. I doubt that a dependency on any of the kernels built with make will be added. Yes, and I didn't like my solution either. I got something here that tests if bsd is there before actually attempting to install which works ok. Since nobody responded I kept it to myself. # Han
¿Queres mejorar tu piel? Vinoterapia en Mar de las Pampas
Si no puede ver correctamente haga click aqui [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Hadad, Gabriel Alberto â Alte. Brown Esq. Copacabana 389 Villa Gesell - Buenos Aires CP 7165 Se le informa que Ud. tiene derecho al retiro o bloqueo total o parcial, de su nombre de nuestra base de datos Presione Aqui [IMAGE]
Re: USB UMTS/3G, deviceclass 255
On 2009/10/22 00:19, Stuart Henderson wrote: I have an Option GT M380E (USB-attached on a Mini PCIE card) which looking at the internal photos should be umsm (MSM7200). It presents the device and all 3 interfaces as class 255/sub 255. No umass. I'll dig some more but wondered if anyone has seen a similar device before and already knows how to handle it? aha, now I remembered to save umsm.c before rebuilding the kernel, it's looking more promising, poking AT commands at ttyU2 works okay. more testing tomorrow...
