Hi Seth,
It is a known issue, I actually had pulled the code for inet_net_pton()
from NetBSD many months ago, when I first realized inet6 masks were not
working in smtpd, but then I got sucked into other stuff and forgot it.
I'll review the diff again ... :-)
Thanks,
Gilles
On Fri, Apr 30,
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 08:56:46 +0059, Jason McIntyre wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 05:36:35PM +1000, Rod Whitworth wrote:
there is no mention of the pass out on $ext_if nat-to 1.2.3.4 way of
doing NAT in the pf.conf manpage for a vanilla firewall. There is one
use of the construct but it refers
2010/4/30, Rod Whitworth glis...@witworx.com:
Quite often we have people wanting a home firewall and these folk are the
ones who will rarely do binat.
Besides that all the examples of NAT in the pf.conf
manpage and the upcoming pf FAQ use the match action without ever
explaining why. (I'll
Hah. No worries; I'm just glad that I wasn't too terribly off-base.
:-) I can be available for testing if needed.
Thanks!
--seth
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Gilles Chehade gil...@poolp.org wrote:
Hi Seth,
It is a known issue, I actually had pulled the code for inet_net_pton()
from
