On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 09:27:51PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
From: Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl
wrote:
(...) I don't really agree with Tedu that the
changed behaviour is an improvement. Say I have
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:24:52 -0500 (EST)
From: logana...@devio.us (Loganaden Velvindron)
Hi, I separated the mclgeti part from the bugfixes for PNIC. Give it a try.
What does this actually fix?
Index: src/sys/dev/ic/dc.c
Hi,
It fixes the idle timeout messages (which is not an issue on PNIC) and sets the
speed to 10BaseTX, since autonegociation is broken on PNIC.
//Logan
C-x-C-c
To: Olde Fort Inn
tech@openbsd.org
b Christmas Toy Driveb
For $ 49.00, help 10 children receive toys for Christmas,
and you will get
X-Rays TWO Free Dental Exams
as well as
TWO Teeth Cleanings
(One now, and one in six month)
(Reg. Price $390)
Expires: Dec. 31st
Important
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 01:52:01AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
this make *hci use the dying flag in struct usbd_bus instead of one in
their own softc. struct usbd_bus is required to be the first member of
*hci_softc.
the bus' dying flag is checked in usbd_is_dying(), which is used to
let
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 04:16:46 -0500 (EST)
logana...@devio.us (Loganaden Velvindron) wrote:
Hi,
It fixes the idle timeout messages (which is not an issue on PNIC) and sets
the speed to 10BaseTX, since autonegociation is broken on PNIC.
//Logan
C-x-C-c
I had a dc with timeout messages
ok?
--
jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
Index: usb_subr.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/usb/usb_subr.c,v
retrieving revision 1.75
diff -u -p usb_subr.c
--- usb_subr.c 6 Dec 2010
Hi, with further encouragement, I decided to give tl(4) a try.
It's a very interesting ethernet chip, and even under heavy tcpbench
the mbuf usage is at most 6. As usual, feedback and comments are welcomed.
//Logan
C-x-C-c
Index: src/sys/dev/pci/if_tl.c
Hi,
autonegociation is broken on tl(4). For some reason 10BaseTX doesn't work. The
lowest value that does work is 100BaseTX. As usual, feedback and comments are
welcomed.
//Logan
C-x-C-c
Index: src/sys/dev/pci/if_tl.c
===
RCS
autonegociation is broken on tl(4). For some reason 10BaseTX doesn't work.
The lowest value that does work is 100BaseTX. As usual, feedback and comments
are welcomed.
How can this diff work for tl devices which are connected to a 10Mbit/s
only PHY?
Miod
It can't negociate for 10Mbit/s. This only sets the default value to 100Mbit/s.
It can adjusted through ifconfig and /etc/hostname.tl0 at startup. My adapter
is OC2-2336. Do you have another tl(4) device ? Perhaps it might be an issue
specific to mine.
//Logan
C-x-C-c
It can't negociate for 10Mbit/s. This only sets the default value to
100Mbit/s. It can adjusted through ifconfig and /etc/hostname.tl0 at
startup. My adapter is OC2-2336. Do you have another tl(4) device ?
Perhaps it might be an issue specific to mine.
I don't have a tl(4) device. It just
In this case, perhaps a better solution would be to mention that
autonegociation is broken, and therefore speeds need to be
adjusted manually in the man page. Does that look better to you ?
//Logan
C-x-C-c
In this case, perhaps a better solution would be to mention that
autonegociation is broken, and therefore speeds need to be
adjusted manually in the man page. Does that look better to you ?
It would be better to know first if other tl(4) users are experiencing
the same problem. Hard to know
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 04:41:43PM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
ok?
--
jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
Index: usb_subr.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/usb/usb_subr.c,v
This makes a lot of sense.
Penned by Jacob Meuser on 20101214 10:41.43, we have:
| ok?
|
| --
| jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
| SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
|
| Index: usb_subr.c
| ===
| RCS file: /cvs/src
I have received a mail regarding the early development of the OpenBSD
IPSEC stack. It is alleged that some ex-developers (and the company
they worked for) accepted US government money to put backdoors into
our network stack, in particular the IPSEC stack. Around 2000-2001.
Since we had the
I wonder a lot about the motives of the original sender sending that message.
Is it simply a way to spread FUD and discredit openbsd?
Is it a personal gripe with the accused?
Is it an attempt to manipulate what is used in the market?
Is it outright lies
Is it outright truth and genuine altruism?
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010, Bob Beck wrote:
I wonder a lot about the motives of the original sender sending that message.
Ignoring motive, and looking at opportunity:
We have never allowed US citizens or foreign citizens working in the US
to hack on crypto code (Niels Provos used to make trips to
Hi Miod,
Here's the relevant part of the dmesg:
l0 at pci0 dev 16 function 0 Olicom OC2326 rev 0x01: irq 10 address 00:00:24:
27:ca:61
ukphy0 at tl0 phy 0: Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface, rev. 0: OUI 0x00,
model 0x
ukphy1 at tl0 phy 31: Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface, rev. 5: OUI
If this type of thing really did happen and this actually is going on
something as simple as systrace or dtrace would have found it correct?
Surely folks have monitored and audited the actual function and traffic that
goes across the wire... conversely amd has a debugger that'll get you
access to
PcDiscount - Diciembre
(*)Bases y Condiciones.
Oferta valida unicamente para nuestros clientes compradores de equipos
Notebooks y Desktop durante el periodo del 01/11 al 31/12.
Servicio brindado en forma gratuita hasta el 31 de Diciembre del 2010 con una
duracion de 20 minutos por
there is no reason for drm_bufs to be poking inside the vmspace on its
own, this is what the uvm_map_hint function is for.
Index: drm_bufs.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/drm/drm_bufs.c,v
retrieving revision 1.46
diff -u -r1.46
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:26:44PM -0500, Brandon Mercer wrote:
If this type of thing really did happen and this actually is going on
something as simple as systrace or dtrace would have found it correct?
Surely folks have monitored and audited the actual function and traffic that
goes across
24 matches
Mail list logo
