Re: ls(1) multibyte support

2011-01-04 Thread Jordi Beltran Creix
2011/1/5 Alexander Polakov : > 1) wcwidth(0x200B) > This if from http://unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/ : > > 200B;ZERO WIDTH SPACE;Cf;0;BN;N; > 200C;ZERO WIDTH NON-JOINER;Cf;0;BN;N; > 200D;ZERO WIDTH JOINER;Cf;0;BN;N; > > --- share/locale/ctype/en_US.UTF-8.src.orig B B Tue Ja

Server Dedicado para Email

2011-01-04 Thread Su Mail Tiene Poder::Go
This is a message in multipart MIME format. Your mail client should not be displaying this. Consider upgrading your mail client to view this message correctly.

Cursos Enero 2011 - Segunda semana

2011-01-04 Thread ACP
Cursos Enero 2011 - Segunda semana * Introduccion a la programacion (C#) - Martes y jueves de 18:30 a 21.30hs. 4/01/2011. Costo Total: $400. Detalle: Este curso constituye la base necesaria para construir programas de computadora con fines practicos en diversos lenguajes y ambientes. El asistente

Re: ls(1) multibyte support

2011-01-04 Thread Alexander Polakov
* Stefan Sperling [110104 23:12]: > On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 09:14:51PM +0300, Alexander Polakov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I wonder if there any plans on adding multibyte support for ls(1)? > > Or maybe there's a reason why it's not a great idea (which I am not > > aware of)? > > Anyway, here's a pat

Re: ls(1) multibyte support

2011-01-04 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 09:14:51PM +0300, Alexander Polakov wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder if there any plans on adding multibyte support for ls(1)? > Or maybe there's a reason why it's not a great idea (which I am not > aware of)? > Anyway, here's a patch I have. It's based on DragonFlyBSD's ls. > A

ls(1) multibyte support

2011-01-04 Thread Alexander Polakov
Hi, I wonder if there any plans on adding multibyte support for ls(1)? Or maybe there's a reason why it's not a great idea (which I am not aware of)? Anyway, here's a patch I have. It's based on DragonFlyBSD's ls. diff -u ls/ls.c ls/ls.c --- ls/ls.c Wed Nov 24 17:39:05 2010 +++ ls/ls.c T

Re: allow ugen(4) to attach to unused interfaces

2011-01-04 Thread Ian Darwin
On 01/04/11 00:13, Yojiro UO wrote: > as the ugen(4) is too flexible (and unsafe) than other usb device drivers, > i don't like this work to extend ugen(4)'s area. > > I know many userland applications which supports multiple platform using > ugen type interface (because they usually use libusb or

Re: OpenOSPF6d does not send LSAs for passive interfaces

2011-01-04 Thread Jan Johansson
Patrick Coleman wrote: > Ok, the following should fix this. It's a little more involved; here's > what's new: > - Avoid sending LSAs if the link state is down (to avoid > double-advertising CARP interfaces). OSPFd does this a little more > elegantly using metrics[1], but I wasn't able to get that

Re: OpenOSPF6d does not send LSAs for passive interfaces

2011-01-04 Thread Patrick Coleman
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Jan Johansson wrote: > If an CARP interface is in BACKUP state the route is still > advertised which leads to assymetric routing. Ok, the following should fix this. It's a little more involved; here's what's new: - Avoid sending LSAs if the link state is down (to a

Re: fsck and mount handling in bsd.rd

2011-01-04 Thread Alexander Hall
On 12/22/10 10:59, Alexander Hall wrote: > As noted by Peter Miller, the fsck and mount procedures in bsd.rd > differ from /etc/rc. Specifically, he had issues with usb disks that > were not always present at boot. While /etc/rc would not fsck > those (since fs_passno == 0) and ignore any issues wi