On 16 jan 2011, at 23.03, Brad wrote:
> The release is quickly approaching. The proposed diff still has issues. If
> this stuff is not resolved and commited before the release nsd in base
> should be disabled. Shipping incomplete and broken stuff isn't very useful
> for users.
I agree. Do we hav
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 03:35:43PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
| On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
| >> >Additionally, i very much prefer to have as little as possible
| >> >differecnes between expr(1) and the ksh builtin.
| >>
| >> Ehum, running the risk of looking like a comple
Looks pretty good. I might add an undo boundary
around the whole thing (I note emacs doesn't do this
properly, at least on the version I have here)...
like so:
Index: def.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/mg/def.h,v
retrieving revisio
On Friday 01 October 2010 16:50:33 Jakob Schlyter wrote:
> The following patches makes establish the following default NSD
> permissions/locations:
>
> - /var/nsd/db for stuff that nsd(8) may write to (as user/group _nsd)
> - /var/nsd/nsd.db for the read-only database.
> - /var/nsd/zones default zo
On Sunday 16 January 2011 16:44:47 Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:18:19 +0100
> > From: Matthieu Herrb
> >
> > I redid a make build with just that. It finished ok without errors.
> >
> > *but* I noticed about a dozen of error like this one during the build,
> > concerning rando
> Earlier in this thread somebody suggested to restrict the pciide
> downgrade to Ultra-DMA mode 2 to just the broken Acer Labs controller.
> That is actually really easy to do. The big question is whether we
> want to do this just on sparc64 (and add an ugly #ifdef __sparc64__ in
> otherwise MI c
> Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:18:19 +0100
> From: Matthieu Herrb
>
> I redid a make build with just that. It finished ok without errors.
>
> *but* I noticed about a dozen of error like this one during the build,
> concerning random block numbers:
>
> wd0a: DMA error reading fsbn 12543712 of 125
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 08:10:09PM +0300, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
>
> Sorry for being stupid. Do you mean this?
>
> "This value is multiplied by the number of 512-byte blocks in a sector
> to yield the size of the file system in 512-byte blocks, which is the
> value used by the kernel. Actual size
On 15 January 2011 ?. 04:47:01 Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 02:16:34AM +0300, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> >
> > It's obvious now, who is native English speaker, and who is not. ;)
> > The phrase "The argument may contain a multiplier, as documented in
> > scan_scaled" was taken from s
Benny Lofgren wrote:
> - Since expr previously ignored switches altogether, strings starting
> with '-' will no longer be recognized as strings, but probably generate
> a "usage:" error message instead. This can be circumvented by the --
> notation, and that particular form was actually suppor
10 matches
Mail list logo
