Compactas con gran Zoom

2011-02-15 Thread DigitalesNet
USD369 Panasonic TZ10 Cámara digital compacta, visor electrónico / Sensor CCD de 12,20 MP efectivos / Objetivo (en 35 mm) 28,0 - 504

Re: OpenBSD 4.8 RAID 0+1 or 1+0 or 5

2011-02-15 Thread Marco Peereboom
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 06:52:58PM -0500, Steven R. Gerber wrote: > On 2/15/2011 5:52 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote: > > it isn't supported so don't do it. it is in the pipeline to do stacked > > raid sets but it is all talk for now. > > > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 02:45:13PM -0500, Steven R. Gerber

Re: OpenBSD 4.8 RAID 0+1 or 1+0 or 5

2011-02-15 Thread Steven R. Gerber
On 2/15/2011 5:52 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote: > it isn't supported so don't do it. it is in the pipeline to do stacked > raid sets but it is all talk for now. > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 02:45:13PM -0500, Steven R. Gerber wrote: >> Sorry for cross posting? >> I am trying to setup a decent RAID (0+

Re: plug a memleak in output_listing()

2011-02-15 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 01:37:10PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 07:34:41PM -0300, Gleydson Soares wrote: > > plug a memleak in output_listing(); from NetBSD > > Index: aicasm.c > > === > > RCS file: /cvs/src/sy

NULL Unsecured lo an for Olde Fort Inn

2011-02-15 Thread SBF
Having trouble reading this email? View it in your browser. [http://bm1.nocserv2.com/display.php?M=350729&C=1725fed0dc8f42111f3fbb289eec5001&S=100&L=15&N=23] StrategicFundingGroup $8,000 - $600,000 Unsecured Business Lo an for Olde Fort Inn When banks say No, We say YES! Turn $50,000 to $200,00

Re: OpenBSD 4.8 RAID 0+1 or 1+0 or 5

2011-02-15 Thread Marco Peereboom
it isn't supported so don't do it. it is in the pipeline to do stacked raid sets but it is all talk for now. On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 02:45:13PM -0500, Steven R. Gerber wrote: > Sorry for cross posting? > I am trying to setup a decent RAID (0+1 or 1+0 or 5) and there SEEMS to > be no approved meth

Re: Incorrect exit status from which(1)/whereis(1)

2011-02-15 Thread David Julio
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Jason McIntyre wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:31:18AM +, David Julio wrote: >> Is the exit status of which(1)/whereis(1) correct? >> >> $ which a b c >> which: a: Command not found >> which: b: Command not found >> which: c: Command not found >> >> $ echo

OpenBSD 4.8 RAID 0+1 or 1+0 or 5

2011-02-15 Thread Steven R. Gerber
Sorry for cross posting? I am trying to setup a decent RAID (0+1 or 1+0 or 5) and there SEEMS to be no approved method. (4 disks -- I usually like stripe on top of mirrors.) I believe that I have done my homework. What are my options? softraid (bioctl) cannot handle stripe on mirrors: I can easil

Re: Incorrect exit status from which(1)/whereis(1)

2011-02-15 Thread Thordur Bjornsson
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 05:30:11PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:31:18AM +, David Julio wrote: > > Is the exit status of which(1)/whereis(1) correct? > > > > $ which a b c > > which: a: Command not found > > which: b: Command not found > > which: c: Command not foun

Re: Apple JP108-B amphy(4) clone diff

2011-02-15 Thread Loganaden Velvindron
I think it's the PHY that ship on udav(4) devices, but a newer revision. udav0 at uhub5 port 2 "Unknown Vendor DM9601" rev 1.10/1.01 addr 3 udav0: address 00:00:00:0c:00:de amphy0 at udav0 phy 0: DM9601 10/100 PHY, rev. 1 ^^ Compared to the ``older''

Re: MicroLinear 6692 PHY for tl(4) -- Olicom 2326

2011-02-15 Thread Loganaden Velvindron
Hi, Yes, the diff does work with half/full duplex. I fixed the style issues & added checks for other being NULL. To test those changes, I disabled tlphy & ukphy, and tested the tl adapter with mlphy only. All modes work. I think it's better to be on the safe side and assume that the companion PHY

Re: Incorrect exit status from which(1)/whereis(1)

2011-02-15 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:31:18AM +, David Julio wrote: > Is the exit status of which(1)/whereis(1) correct? > > $ which a b c > which: a: Command not found > which: b: Command not found > which: c: Command not found > > $ echo $? > 2 > > $ which -a a b c > which: a: Command not found > whi

Re: Tracking What it's changing in current

2011-02-15 Thread BSD
On 02/15/11 10:54, Orestes Leal R. wrote: I need to see (with a tool or whatever) what changes have occured between current, let's say between current 4.9 from february 9 and current dated february 14. They are logged in some place? cvs

Nikon P100 y Canon SX30

2011-02-15 Thread DigitalesNet
USD479 Camara Digital NIKON P100 Tipo compacta, visor electrónico / Sensor CMOS de 10,30 MP efectivos / Objetivo (en 35 mm) 26,0 - 67

Re: MicroLinear 6692 PHY for tl(4) -- Olicom 2326

2011-02-15 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 01:28:28PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2011/02/15 14:05, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > > > > > /* > > >* Micro Linear PHY reports oui == 0 model == 0 > > >*/ > > > if (MII_OUI(ma->mii_id1, ma->mii_id2) != 0 || > > > MII_MODEL(ma->mii_id2) != 0) > > >

Re: MicroLinear 6692 PHY for tl(4) -- Olicom 2326

2011-02-15 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011/02/15 14:05, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > > > /* > > * Micro Linear PHY reports oui == 0 model == 0 > > */ > > if (MII_OUI(ma->mii_id1, ma->mii_id2) != 0 || > >MII_MODEL(ma->mii_id2) != 0) > > return (0); > > /* > > * Make sure the parent is a `tl

Re: MicroLinear 6692 PHY for tl(4) -- Olicom 2326

2011-02-15 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 05:03:03AM -0500, Loganaden Velvindron wrote: > Hi, > > Claudio suggested to me a better way of cycling through the PHYs. > Does this look good ? > > /*$OpenBSD: ukphy.c,v 1.20 2010/07/23 07:47:13 jsg Exp $ */ > /*$NetBSD: ukphy.c,v 1.9 2000/02/02 23:34:57 thorpej

Re: ifconfig vlan tag range

2011-02-15 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:08:24PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote: > * Camiel Dobbelaar [2011-02-09 20:34]: > > The valid range for vlan tags in OpenBSD is 0-4095 (inclusive). > > not only in openbsd - that's what you can fit in the 12 bits ;) > > > Index: ifconfig.c > > ===

Re: plug a memleak in output_listing()

2011-02-15 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 07:34:41PM -0300, Gleydson Soares wrote: > plug a memleak in output_listing(); from NetBSD > Index: aicasm.c > === > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/microcode/aic7xxx/aicasm.c,v > retrieving revision 1.14 > diff -u -

Re: History for bc(1)

2011-02-15 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:23:41PM +0100, Gabriel Linder wrote: > On 02/14/11 17:43, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote: > >Any news on this ? > > > > The diff still apply on -current. If there are changes needed I can > work on it, but I have no news. sorry, in have a diff in my tree, but I see myse

Re: alc(4) support for Atheros AR815x

2011-02-15 Thread Gabriel Linder
On 01/25/11 11:24, Kevin Lo wrote: Hi, The following diff adds support for Atheros AR8151/AR8152 chipsets; mostly from FreeBSD. It also fixes an issue i386/6311. Tested on Acer AOD255E. Tried yesterday on EeePC 1005PX, some comments inline. @@ -515,6 +694,20 @@ alc_attach(struct device *pare

Re: History for bc(1)

2011-02-15 Thread Gabriel Linder
On 02/14/11 17:43, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote: Any news on this ? The diff still apply on -current. If there are changes needed I can work on it, but I have no news.

Re: bgpd: fix error message "enforce remote-as enabled"

2011-02-15 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:06:58PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2011/02/14 21:39, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > > > After a bit more thinking I like this version a lot better. This correctly > > prints the neighbor AS number in both cases 16bit and 32bit AS Number. > > Ok. > > Personally the