On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:55:05AM +, Federico G. Schwindt wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:51:50AM +, Federico G. Schwindt wrote:
[..]
Patch below fixes the issue with our in-tree lynx.
Top-right shows (p1 of 2) correctly and allows one
to page down to see last line of the
On Wednesday 16 February 2011, Steven R. Gerber wrote:
Sorry for cross posting?
I am trying to setup a decent RAID (0+1 or 1+0 or 5) and there SEEMS to
be no approved method. (4 disks -- I usually like stripe on top of
mirrors.)
I believe that I have done my homework.
What are my options?
On 02/15/11 13:01, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
sorry, in have a diff in my tree, but I see myself always ignoring it.
I just almost never actually use the editing capabilities. It seems my
25yr finger memory is too strong. So I'm not a proper tester for this
diff, other than it does not seem to cause
CURSO TALLER
Tecnicas Especializadas en los Procesos de Credito y Cobranza
Duracion: (1 dma) 8 hrs.
Inversion: $ 4,150 pesos mas IVA
Objetivo: Reconozca y cimente los principios y metodos que puede aplicar
en el otorgamiento de CREDITO, LA PREVENCION y RECUPERACION de la CARTERA
por CREDITOS
On 2011/02/16 12:34, Steven R. Gerber wrote:
Now, I have an EXPERIMENTAL RAID 5 volume. Not the worst.
***
sd9 at scsibus4 targ 0 lun 0: OPENBSD, SR RAID 5, 004 SCSI2 0/direct fixed
sd9: 5723178MB, 512 bytes/sec, 11721070081 sec total
***
But, EXPERIMENTAL RAID 5 is dangerous (Marco
On 2011-02-16 19.04, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011/02/16 12:34, Steven R. Gerber wrote:
Now, I have an EXPERIMENTAL RAID 5 volume. Not the worst.
***
sd9 at scsibus4 targ 0 lun 0: OPENBSD, SR RAID 5, 004 SCSI2 0/direct fixed
sd9: 5723178MB, 512 bytes/sec, 11721070081 sec total
***
But,
