The Unforgettable Fire The
Joshua Tree The Best Of
1990 2000 D-Sides The
Best 1980 1990 B-Sides Pop p October r October
would anyone else find this (or a variation thereof) useful?
example use: if you download a partial snapshot and would like to
check files, this makes it easy to identify whether a file actually
fails the checksum, or whether you just don't have it.
Index: md5.c
please disregard this diff. it's wrong.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Mike Belopuhov m...@crypt.org.ru wrote:
this allows us to get rid of the nasty NATLOOKUP ioctl and get
the original server address right from the socket. also this
paves the way to the transparent ftp-proxy mode.
if you
I would find it more accurate to report 'fopen FAILED' rather than
expect that all failures to open a file are a result of a missing file.
Penned by Stuart Henderson on 20110408 4:23.44, we have:
| would anyone else find this (or a variation thereof) useful?
|
| example use: if you download
Hello,
I'm in period of an internship, and I will use OpenBSD in my task. Actually
I have a problem concerning pf.
the issue is to count volume of packets belonging to a session and a session
is defined as the following :*@source, @dest, Port source, Port dest, and
protocole used TCP/UDP/ICMP*
So
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 11:23:44 +0200, Stuart Henderson wrote:
would anyone else find this (or a variation thereof) useful?
example use: if you download a partial snapshot and would like to
check files, this makes it easy to identify whether a file actually
fails the checksum, or whether you
If you are having trouble viewing this e-mail, Visit
www.catererswarehouse.com Caterer's Warehouse Weekly Specials
Caterer's Warehouse Special Offers
Home | Catering Supplies | Restaurant Equipment | Tabletop Specialties
Bakery Supplies | Bar Supplies | Kitchen Supplies | Commercial Furniture
|
Hi,
referring to http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-portsm=129789998809077w=2
I am in the process of updating llvm+clang from 2.8 == 2.9
(maintainer is ports@). Done the update on amd64 (will need some
feedback) sending as a separate email. Update can go in or not, but
clang++ C++ compiler absolutely
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 12:43:03PM -0500, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
I am in the process of updating llvm+clang from 2.8 == 2.9
(maintainer is ports@).
jsg@ already has an update for this. I believe he's just checking for
broken dependencies now.
Will some guru please find time to investigate this
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 07:53:51PM +0200, Frank Brodbeck wrote:
Hi,
lately I was reading on misc@ [1] that there's no way to remove a user
from secondary groups but by hand. I also searched for a PR but couldn't
find one. The attached diff remedies the problem:
# id test
uid=1001(test)
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Frank Brodbeck f...@guug.de wrote:
lately I was reading on misc@ [1] that there's no way to remove a user
from secondary groups but by hand. I also searched for a PR but couldn't
find one. The attached diff remedies the problem:
+ while ((cp =
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 09:54:37PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 07:53:51PM +0200, Frank Brodbeck wrote:
Hi,
lately I was reading on misc@ [1] that there's no way to remove a user
from secondary groups but by hand. I also searched for a PR but couldn't
find one.
Hey Michael,
I wrote a response, see below, but for future reference your question
should have been directed at misc@. The tech@ list is for discussions
related to development. Please look over http://openbsd.org/mail.html
before posting.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 15:20, Michael Lechtermann
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 09:54:37PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
Hmm.. please no. Don't know if it's a bug or not, but i'm very used to
-G to _add_ groups to the existing group list for a user. If i
understand your diff correctly, one has to list all the groups it wants
the user to be in,
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 09:00:45PM -0400, Brad wrote:
Some _LP64 ifdef's leftover from rev 1.1. They appear to be unnecessary
since this code is only for amd64 anyway and thus a 64-bit arch.
Index: pmap.c
===
RCS file:
If you are having trouble viewing this e-mail, Visit
www.catererswarehouse.com Caterer's Warehouse Weekly Specials
Caterer's Warehouse Special Offers
Home | Catering Supplies | Restaurant Equipment | Tabletop Specialties
Bakery Supplies | Bar Supplies | Kitchen Supplies | Commercial Furniture
|
16 matches
Mail list logo