Testers needed for softraid diff

2011-05-31 Thread Matthew Dempsky
The diff below simplifies softraid(4) and makes it more like other SCSI HBA drivers. Instead of attaching a scsibus(4) for each logical disk, it attaches just one scsibus(4) and attaches each logical disk to a unique target on the bus. This also avoids the games softraid(4) currently plays to wor

Re: switch to xkeyboard-config XKB configuration: please test

2011-05-31 Thread Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 08:22:09PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Mon, 30 May 2011, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Some years ago X.Org decided to switch to a new set of XKB (the X > > Keyboard extension) data files known as xkeyboard-config. > > > > For various reasons (local cha

Re: make \user syntax more explicit in forward(5)

2011-05-31 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Thomas, i don't use .forward(5) and am not sure whether what you say is true or false, but the form is definitely not ok. Thomas de Grivel wrote on Tue, May 31, 2011 at 08:15:28PM +0200: > --- forward.5.~1.9.~ Wed May 4 17:24:22 2011 > +++ forward.5 Tue May 31 19:53:17 2011 > @@ -35,8 +35,8

Re: switch to xkeyboard-config XKB configuration: please test

2011-05-31 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Mon, 30 May 2011, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > Hi, > > Some years ago X.Org decided to switch to a new set of XKB (the X > Keyboard extension) data files known as xkeyboard-config. > > For various reasons (local changes, complexity of the build system for > xkeyboard-config, slacking) Xenocara i

make \user syntax more explicit in forward(5)

2011-05-31 Thread Thomas de Grivel
Hi I'd like to donate a small patch to share/man/man5/forward.5 It explains the \user syntax a bit more explicitly. Cheers -- Thomas de Grivel http://b.lowh.net/billitch "I must plunge into the water of doubt again and again." --- forward.5.~1.9.~Wed May 4 17:24:22 2011 +++ forward.5 T

Re: bc and editline

2011-05-31 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 05:57:18PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 07:02:55AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > adding editline caused a regrssion in the handling of ^C. > > > > Originally (and I mean the days of AT&T) bc used ^C as an abort line. > > With edit

Re: enable msi for ix(4)

2011-05-31 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 08:17:33AM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:21:33AM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote: > > similar to other such diffs, this enables msi for ix(4). > > > > OK? > > > > Index: dev/pci/if_ix.c > > ==

Re: enable msi for ix(4)

2011-05-31 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:21:33AM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote: > similar to other such diffs, this enables msi for ix(4). > > OK? > > Index: dev/pci/if_ix.c > === > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_ix.c,v > retrieving revision 1.51

enable msi for ix(4)

2011-05-31 Thread Peter Hessler
similar to other such diffs, this enables msi for ix(4). OK? Index: dev/pci/if_ix.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_ix.c,v retrieving revision 1.51 diff -u -p -r1.51 if_ix.c --- dev/pci/if_ix.c 15 Apr 2011 15:12:27 -

Re: km(4) support for AMD Family 14h processors

2011-05-31 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Brad, Brad wrote on Mon, May 30, 2011 at 07:44:37PM -0400: > Index: share/man/man4/km.4 [...] > +.\" .%O http://support.amd.com/us/Processor_TechDocs/31116.pdf Why are the URIs commented out? Both mandoc and modern groff handle %U properly. OK for the following diff? Ingo Index: km.4 ==