aries.technol...@gmx.co.uk has sent you a Aries Technology Inc. Social Media
Press Release.
We're Giving Away 90 days FREE on Courses!
Increase Enrollment By Offering Certification Programs
Need the IC3, Living online and Key apps GET A a 90 day trial!!
Request a Free Demo call
Click here
Hello,
I just want to know if it plan to have a real implitation of L2TP on OpenBSD.
Is there a work in progress ? or never ?
Thank's
Bruno Gruel
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by Amavisd-new, and is
believed to be clean.
Gruel Bruno b.gr...@woody.hopto.org writes:
Hello,
Hi.
I just want to know if it plan to have a real implitation of L2TP on OpenBSD.
Is there a work in progress ? or never ?
Without knowing what you already know about OpenBSD and L2TP, it's a bit
difficult to answer. Consider taking a look
On 2011/08/17 12:18, Gruel Bruno wrote:
Hello,
I just want to know if it plan to have a real implitation of L2TP on OpenBSD.
Is there a work in progress ? or never ?
See /usr/src/usr.sbin/npppd; it is not built/distributed by default yet,
but the code is there.
According to the sysctl(3) man page, calling sysctl with a NULL value for
oldp should result in the current size being returned. This works correctly
for sysctl_rdstring(), but not for sysctl__string().
ok?
Index: kern_sysctl.c
===
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:43:54PM +1000, Joel Sing wrote:
According to the sysctl(3) man page, calling sysctl with a NULL value for
oldp should result in the current size being returned.
Hm, it also says when ENOMEM is returned, that we'll fill in as much
data as possible, which doesn't seem
Currently when ospfd is started with ospfd -v, the verbose logging flag
is only set for the parent process, so the detailed messages from rde/ospfe
are not logged.
The diff below passes it to the other processes so that if you store all
ospfd logs you'll get the same information logged with -v as
On 2011/08/17 17:28, Stuart Henderson wrote:
I guess ripd, ldpd, ospf6d, bgpd, ldapd and dvmrpd will have a similar
problem,
oh, and a few others, I was just looking for IMSG_CTL_LOG_VERBOSE...
On 2011/08/17 17:28, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Currently when ospfd is started with ospfd -v, the verbose logging flag
is only set for the parent process, so the detailed messages from rde/ospfe
are not logged.
The diff below passes it to the other processes so that if you store all
ospfd
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 06:07:21PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011/08/17 17:28, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Currently when ospfd is started with ospfd -v, the verbose logging flag
is only set for the parent process, so the detailed messages from rde/ospfe
are not logged.
The diff
Hello,
First thank's for your help et very good jobs for npppd, it's realy a good
tool. But it seem not to do what i want.
(http://fai.woody.hopto.org/Docs/bsdrp-example-pppoe-l2tp.png).
I will try rp-l2tp
How can i have a full doc off npppd ??
But i confirm that npppd work fine on my lab.
vmwares pxe rom in guests uses the giaddr (the address of the dhcp
relay) as the default ip gateway.
this is a problem if you're running carped firewalls, because you'll
be running a dhcrelay on each of them attached to the hardware
interface, not the carped interface. if the vmware client
This diff adds to touch(1) support for the -d option specified by POSIX
2008 that permits specifying subsecond timestamps, as well as nanosecond
support in the -r option, and a general simplification over the main loop.
oks?
Philip
Index: usr.bin/touch/touch.1
13 matches
Mail list logo
