On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Henning Brauer
wrote:
> diffs are for current of course but should work for 5.1 as well -
> dunno what you are trying.
>
Dear Henning,
I have upgraded my firewall to 5.1
could you please give ma a unified diff or something I can try
Thanks
Siju
View online/mobile version
https://www.magnetmail.net/actions/email_web_version.cfm?recipient_id=8589472
51&message_id=1939725&user_id=CM_AG&VERSION=TEXT&group_id=760280&jobid=101454
52
Pay-As-You-Go Workers' Compensation Insurance
"Finally Made Cost Effective and Simple"7 Have your current Insur
I got a few reports from Windows dual-booters that things still work
as expected for them, so it seems like it shouldn't cause any issues
or break any existing use cases now.
ok to commit?
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 03:06:42PM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:27:00PM +0400
Ping? Anyone care to ok?
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 03:42:33PM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> According to POSIX, accept(), recvfrom(), recvmsg(), getsockname(),
> and getpeername() are supposed to store the untruncated address length
> in *addrlen.
>
> Diff below makes our methods conform to this
