On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 09:03:05PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
Comparing cvs log output between GNU CVS 1.11.1p1 and OpenCVS...
- mwb: 1.1.1
+ mwb: 1.1.0.1
OpenCVS mangles the revision number.
So it looks like branch numbers that we read in don't need to
be translated
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 11:17, Tobias Stoeckmann wrote:
Your patch breaks this compatibility for every branch except the initial
one. GNU CVS is not consistent about its behavior in many ways.
Ha! This is the same bug I was looking into last week. I wasn't sure in
what circumstances adding
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 11:04:31AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 11:17, Tobias Stoeckmann wrote:
Your patch breaks this compatibility for every branch except the initial
one. GNU CVS is not consistent about its behavior in many ways.
Ha! This is the same bug I was
