Brad Smith:
> Here is another revision but disabling the UDP checksum offload.
> There is a bug that results in some UDP packets having a 0 checksum.
Oh, right. I assume you are referencing this FreeBSD commit?
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c?r1=211595&r2=211596&diff_for
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 09:41:08PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Previously, we couldn't enable TCP/UDP transmit checksum offload
> on chipsets that require the checksum field to be initialized with
> the pseudo-header checksum because this would break rdr-to 127.0.0.1.
>
> Henning's epic r
On 03/11/2012, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Previously, we couldn't enable TCP/UDP transmit checksum offload
> on chipsets that require the checksum field to be initialized with
> the pseudo-header checksum because this would break rdr-to 127.0.0.1.
>
> Henning's epic rewrite of the checksum hand
Like bge(4), we previously couldn't enable TCP/UDP transmit checksum
offload on em(4). We can now.
Works fine here on
em0 at pci1 dev 1 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82540EM)" rev 0x02
and with VLAN on
em0 at pci5 dev 0 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000 MT (82574L)" rev 0x00
Does anybody see any va
Previously, we couldn't enable TCP/UDP transmit checksum offload
on chipsets that require the checksum field to be initialized with
the pseudo-header checksum because this would break rdr-to 127.0.0.1.
Henning's epic rewrite of the checksum handling has fixed this
problem, so let's enable TCP/UDP
Quick background: In pflogd(8), the if_exists() function tests if a
given pflogX interface exists. It returns 1 (if it exists) or 0 (if
not).
This diff fixes two issues with if_exists():
1. if_exists() opens a socket to test the pflogX interface exists. If
the interface does not exist, the f
Found while investigating a llvm report. Since this doesn't actually
do anything, the dot handling of undo (i.e. move dot to where an undo
is happening) is fine afaic, I'd like to remove this. Unless someone
has a diff to make this useful...
Also note the rather elaborate way an int is set to zero
Thanks for fixing my mistake :-)
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Christiano F. Haesbaert
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 04:44:36PM +0100, rustyBSD wrote:
>> Le 30/10/2012 15:32, Christiano F. Haesbaert a ?crit :
>> > That should be an access(2) call.
>> Yes.Something like this - also moved len
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 04:44:36PM +0100, rustyBSD wrote:
> Le 30/10/2012 15:32, Christiano F. Haesbaert a ?crit :
> > That should be an access(2) call.
> Yes.Something like this - also moved len to size_t,
> as strlen() is size_t:
>
>
> --- dired.cWed Mar 14 14:56:35 2012
> +++ dired.cTu
Hi all,
Here is a patch I've made to select the algorithm and its
parameters used for a softraid encryption. I added an extra field
to the kdfinfo structure to retrieve the algorithm type from
userland (This structure may need to be renamed in the future).
I also modified bioctl to allow this extr
10 matches
Mail list logo