Re: diff: dhcp-options(5) vs. dhcpd/tables.c

2013-01-02 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 07:24:53PM +0100, MERIGHI Marcus wrote: Hello, playing with option-252 I found it already has a name. Found that as well: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=126573542214773 Wrote a little script to find undocumented options, see end of message. I moved some

[PATCH] mbuf.9 update

2013-01-02 Thread r...@ozmun.us
--- mbuf.9 17 Nov 2012 10:55:21 - 1.58 +++ mbuf.9 2 Jan 2013 21:04:56 - @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ .\ (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF .\ THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. .\ -.Dd $Mdocdate: November 17 2012 $

units(1): add a count to from-unit

2013-01-02 Thread Jason McIntyre
a current undocumented feature of units(1) is that you can specify a numerical count when in non-interactive mode: $ units 10 GBP USD * 16.167 / 0.061854395 but neither of these methods work: $ units 10 GBP USD $ units 10GBP USD netbsd made the first of

Re: [PATCH] mbuf.9 update

2013-01-02 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 03:07:14PM -0600, r...@ozmun.us wrote: --- mbuf.9 17 Nov 2012 10:55:21 - 1.58 +++ mbuf.9 2 Jan 2013 21:04:56 - this diff doesn;t apply cleanly. is your mailer mangling spaces or something? jmc

localtime_r on sparc64

2013-01-02 Thread David Hill
Hello - Not sure if my code is wrong, or if sparc64 has a bug? The following code produces different results on sparc64 vs i386. i386 results: $ ./code seconds: 1357170317 year: 2013 sparc64 results: $ ./code seconds: 1357170432 year: 1969 /* * code */ #include sys/types.h #include

Re: localtime_r on sparc64

2013-01-02 Thread David Hill
My code is wrong! Yikes. Doing undefined things! Ignore :) On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 06:54:20PM -0500, David Hill wrote: Hello - Not sure if my code is wrong, or if sparc64 has a bug? The following code produces different results on sparc64 vs i386. i386 results: $ ./code seconds: 1357170317

Re: localtime_r on sparc64

2013-01-02 Thread Theo de Raadt
Your code is completely wrong. Not sure if my code is wrong, or if sparc64 has a bug? The following code produces different results on sparc64 vs i386. i386 results: $ ./code seconds: 1357170317 year: 2013 sparc64 results: $ ./code seconds: 1357170432 year: 1969 /* * code

Re: [PATCH] mbuf.9 update

2013-01-02 Thread Ryan Ozmun
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, Jason McIntyre wrote: On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 03:07:14PM -0600, r...@ozmun.us wrote: --- mbuf.9 17 Nov 2012 10:55:21 - 1.58 +++ mbuf.9 2 Jan 2013 21:04:56 - this diff doesn;t apply cleanly. is your mailer mangling spaces or something? jmc

adduser: better locked password

2013-01-02 Thread Tobias Ulmer
Adding a user with a locked password is a deliberate action. Set the password to * to stop security(8) from complaining about the new user. OK? Index: adduser.perl === RCS file:

[PATCH] iovec array size in pppoe

2013-01-02 Thread Michael W. Bombardieri
Hi, I am submitting a small patch for pppoe... The iovec array in send_padi() can contain either 7 or 8 elements. The following patch declares the array as having size of 8 rather than 10. Does this look OK? - Michael Index: client.c

Re: [PATCH] mbuf.9 update

2013-01-02 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 07:40:19PM -0600, Ryan Ozmun wrote: On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, Jason McIntyre wrote: On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 03:07:14PM -0600, r...@ozmun.us wrote: --- mbuf.9 17 Nov 2012 10:55:21 - 1.58 +++ mbuf.9 2 Jan 2013 21:04:56 - this diff doesn;t