On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 07:42:32 +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
i don;t much like describing shell behaviour in other pages, but
we do do it in other pages, and i agree this one seems particularly
likely to catch folks out. fix coming...
I agree about the shell behaviour being something the beginners
The ifaddr structure contains a reference counter and two different way
to check it before freeing its memory: a macro IFAFREE(), and a function
ifafree().
Because the former calls the latter when the reference counter is null,
and then also check for the reference counter, I see no point in
Function ifa_ifwithaf() is not used, any reason to keep it?
Ok to kill it?
diff --git sys/net/if.c sys/net/if.c
index e3c4ba4..826e526 100644
--- sys/net/if.c
+++ sys/net/if.c
@@ -934,27 +934,6 @@ ifa_ifwithnet(struct sockaddr *addr, u_int rdomain)
}
/*
- * Find an interface using a specific
On 5 March 2013 11:55, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 11:36:36 +0100
From: Martin Pieuchot mpieuc...@nolizard.org
The ifaddr structure contains a reference counter and two different way
to check it before freeing its memory: a macro IFAFREE(), and a
Hi tech@
I send you this mail because a few months ago I tried to dabble with fuse
filesystem and OpenBSD. After some time working on this subject I have
succeeded to create something that works. It is not even near to be perfect
but with some changes and adaptions I think it could do the job.
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 01:43:24PM +0100, Sylvestre Gallon wrote:
Hi tech@
I send you this mail because a few months ago I tried to dabble with fuse
filesystem and OpenBSD. After some time working on this subject I have
succeeded to create something that works. It is not even near to be
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 01:49:20PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 01:43:24PM +0100, Sylvestre Gallon wrote:
Hi tech@
I send you this mail because a few months ago I tried to dabble with fuse
filesystem and OpenBSD. After some time working on this subject I have
Sylvestre, one of the problems with fuse itself is that it's GPL
licensed, and not appropriate
for inclusion in base. If you've got interets and talent in this area,
you might want to consider
having a peek at puffs (and refuse) from netbsd which has a workable
license and could
be included in
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 08:50:08PM +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote:
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 07:42:32 +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
i don;t much like describing shell behaviour in other pages, but
we do do it in other pages, and i agree this one seems particularly
likely to catch folks out. fix
OK?
Index: whois.1
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/whois/whois.1,v
retrieving revision 1.31
diff -u -p -r1.31 whois.1
--- whois.1 26 Sep 2012 16:12:14 - 1.31
+++ whois.1 5 Mar 2013 13:56:54 -
@@ -175,6 +175,10 @@
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:54:58AM -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 05:00:08PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:05:29 -0600
From: Todd T. Fries t...@fries.net
In light of nat64 in pf(4), what purpose does faithd(8) serve anymore?
I played with it
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 02:11:41PM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 01:49:20PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 01:43:24PM +0100, Sylvestre Gallon wrote:
Hi tech@
I send you this mail because a few months ago I tried to dabble with fuse
On 05/03/13(Tue) 06:44, Bob Beck wrote:
Sylvestre, one of the problems with fuse itself is that it's GPL
licensed, and not appropriate for inclusion in base. If you've got
interets and talent in this area, you might want to consider
having a peek at puffs (and refuse) from netbsd which has a
On 05/03/13(Tue) 09:03, David Hill wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:54:58AM -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 05:00:08PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:05:29 -0600
From: Todd T. Fries t...@fries.net
In light of nat64 in pf(4), what purpose
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Bob Beck b...@openbsd.org wrote:
Sylvestre, one of the problems with fuse itself is that it's GPL
licensed, and not appropriate
for inclusion in base. If you've got interets and talent in this area,
you might want to consider
having a peek at puffs (and
Nice, that would be one alias less in my .kshrc. :)
--
Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
GPG Key fingerprint: 61DB D9A0 00A4 67CF 2A90 8961 6191 8FBF 06A1 1494
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Sylvestre Gallon ccna@gmail.com wrote:
Martin,
You will find inline the kernel patch
And here the userland :
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.97
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 12:26, Sachidananda Urs wrote:
Attaching patch for review.
Hi,
Any thoughts on this?
It's in my queue. I wanted to touch it up a bit, but waited for the
tree to unlock (it just did). Thanks again.
Not that I mind either way, but did we want to add more hardcoded
flags to whois?
On 03/05/13 14:58, Stuart Henderson wrote:
OK?
Index: whois.1
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/whois/whois.1,v
retrieving revision 1.31
diff -u -p
On 2013/03/05 18:31, Alexander Hall wrote:
Not that I mind either way, but did we want to add more hardcoded
flags to whois?
Did you any some others in mind? Most of the domain-lookup ones are handled
by XX.whois-servers.net, of the others I know of Team Cymru's servers may be
useful but I
On 03/05/13 18:58, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/03/05 18:31, Alexander Hall wrote:
Not that I mind either way, but did we want to add more hardcoded
flags to whois?
Did you any some others in mind? Most of the domain-lookup ones are handled
by XX.whois-servers.net, of the others I
On 2013/03/05 19:04, Alexander Hall wrote:
On 03/05/13 18:58, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/03/05 18:31, Alexander Hall wrote:
Not that I mind either way, but did we want to add more hardcoded
flags to whois?
Did you any some others in mind? Most of the domain-lookup ones are handled
by
22 matches
Mail list logo
