On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 01:08:06AM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
Hey all,
Time for attempt #2!
Adding static to internal function allows the compiler to better
detect dead code (functions, variables, etc) and makes it easier for
the compiler to optimize; e.g., since it knows a function will
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 09:12:21AM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 27 April 2013 09:06, Kenneth R Westerback kwesterb...@rogers.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 08:10:41AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 01:08:06AM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
Hey all,
Time for
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 08:10:41AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 01:08:06AM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
Hey all,
Time for attempt #2!
Adding static to internal function allows the compiler to better
detect dead code (functions, variables, etc) and makes it
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 08:10, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 01:08:06AM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
Adding static to internal function allows the compiler to better
detect dead code (functions, variables, etc) and makes it easier for
the compiler to optimize; e.g., since it knows
On Apr 27, 2013, at 7:36 PM, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 08:10, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 01:08:06AM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
Adding static to internal function allows the compiler to better
detect dead code (functions, variables, etc)
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 09:09:25PM +0200, Franco Fichtner wrote:
On Apr 27, 2013, at 7:36 PM, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 08:10, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 01:08:06AM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
Adding static to internal function
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 09:09:25PM +0200, Franco Fichtner wrote:
On backtrace(3) (which is a GNU thing, I know), static functions don't
show up with their respective names even though they are in the binary.
That's a tad annoying, but I am not aware of any other limitation. Can
someone please
On Apr 27, 2013, at 9:28 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 09:09:25PM +0200, Franco Fichtner wrote:
On backtrace(3) (which is a GNU thing, I know), static functions don't
show up with their respective names even though they are in the binary.
That's
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 09:14:59PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 09:09:25PM +0200, Franco Fichtner wrote:
On Apr 27, 2013, at 7:36 PM, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 08:10, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 01:08:06AM
Hi,
here is a patch to remove two useless variables in ntpd. Spotted
when recompiling with -Wextra.
Ok/Comments?
Index: client.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ntpd/client.c,v
retrieving revision 1.89
diff -u -p -r1.89 client.c
---
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 13:36:31 -0400
From: Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 08:10, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 01:08:06AM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
Adding static to internal function allows the compiler to better
detect dead code (functions,
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 10:30:01PM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
Hi,
here is a patch to remove two useless variables in ntpd. Spotted
when recompiling with -Wextra.
Ok/Comments?
Looks like 'auth' has been removed in revision 1.8 and 'len' in
revision 1.17 of ntp_msg.c but not removed from
On 27 April 2013 15:38, Tobias Ulmer tobi...@tmux.org wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 09:14:59PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 09:09:25PM +0200, Franco Fichtner wrote:
On Apr 27, 2013, at 7:36 PM, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 08:10,
13 matches
Mail list logo
