sigh. why is it always that you notice you forgot to copy the last
iteration of the diff to the mail machine right AFTER hitting send?
Index: netinet/tcp_subr.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/netinet/tcp_subr.c,v
retrieving revision 1.125
Index: netinet/tcp_subr.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/netinet/tcp_subr.c,v
retrieving revision 1.125
diff -u -p -r1.125 tcp_subr.c
--- netinet/tcp_subr.c 24 Oct 2013 11:31:43 - 1.125
+++ netinet/tcp_subr.c 24 Jan 2014 06:31:2
this is used for return-rst for example.
not surprisingly just works here.
Index: net/pf.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/pf.c,v
retrieving revision 1.866
diff -u -p -r1.866 pf.c
--- net/pf.c23 Jan 2014 23:51:29 - 1.866
+
i need this tested on an sk(4).
I don't have that hardware at all.
Index: dev/pci/if_sk.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_sk.c,v
retrieving revision 1.167
diff -u -p -r1.167 if_sk.c
--- dev/pci/if_sk.c 28 Dec 2013 03:36:25 -
clearing these is now utterly pointless, was only done for statistics
before.
moreover, clearing these might even lead to a pointless re-check in
software in some scenarios.
note that these flags have nothing at all to do with the outbound side,
i. e. wether we have to checksum the packet.
Index:
Instead of calculating the ICMPv6 checksum here, just set the flag that
is needed and the lower parts of the stack will take care of it.
I have tested the general ICMPv6, ICMPv6 redirect, and neighbor
discovery parts. I have not tested the MLD part.
Index: icmp6.c
===
On 1/23/14, Miod Vallat wrote:
>> Something is inconsistent here. Do you mean the uk is not the
>> default? Or there is a difference between mux default and new attach
>> default? How does one know whether plugging a keyboard in is
>> reattaching it or attachning a new one?
>
> There is a differen
> Something is inconsistent here. Do you mean the uk is not the
> default? Or there is a difference between mux default and new attach
> default? How does one know whether plugging a keyboard in is
> reattaching it or attachning a new one?
There is a difference between a keyboard which can provide
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 20:57, Miod Vallat wrote:
> - when changing the keyboard layout of a particular keyboard with an
> ioctl (i.e. using kbd(8) or wsconsctl(8)), the layout will become the
> default layout of the mux for new keyboard attachments.
> Now I plug a Sun USB keyboard with the uk la
> Couple of questions:
>
> 1. What if starting from this state:
> $ wsconsctl 2>/dev/null |grep encoding
> keyboard.encoding=us
> keyboard1.encoding=is
> keyboard2.encoding=uk
>
> you unplug the Icelandic and Sun UK keyboards. Next attach
> first the Sun UK keyboard and ne
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 08:57:43PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> [cc: tech@, reply-to set to tech@]
>
> > After suspend or hibernate, I lose my designated console keyboard layout
> > (sv) and it reverts to the default (us?) wsconsctl shows that the
> > encoding to still be sv,
> >
> > keyboa
[cc: tech@, reply-to set to tech@]
> After suspend or hibernate, I lose my designated console keyboard layout
> (sv) and it reverts to the default (us?) wsconsctl shows that the
> encoding to still be sv,
>
> keyboard.encoding=sv
>
> What setting(s) am I missing to preserve the designat
Em 23-01-2014 09:33, Kevin Chadwick escreveu:
> Why would you have so much trust in the ether unless you have met
> someone with say a DNSSEC key or have a web of trust with someone you
> have met and that you trust and has met and swapped keys further up
> the line. The first key for DNSSEC is alm
To clarify, since I got a private mail from a v5 user:
v5 is going to stay for now. It's beyond repair wrt. 2038 but other
than that it's a perfectly fine protocol if you only need to export
IPv4 flows. Also it's not in the way of improving v10 like v9 is.
So I'm not asking you to migrate from v5
A huge swath of clean-up has just hit the trees.
Most specifically, now that it works, the "signing-only" code has been
moved into a separate "pkg_sign" command.
This is partly for documentation purpose: it's much simpler to document
the parameters to that command separately, instead of as additi
previously on this list Giancarlo Razzolini contributed:
I believe that with the interdiction
> programs that NSA has, and maybe also other governments, CD's can not be
> entitled with the same trust as before.
Why would you have so much trust in the ether unless you have met
someone with say a D
Since we are in -beta you are all starting to test snapshots like
crazy, right? Right?!
Please do me a favor, if you're using pflow(4) test if your favorite
collector works with pflowproto 10.
Since the time_t cleanup (rev 1.34 of if_pflow.c) v10 no longer sends
insane flows. I know it now works w
17 matches
Mail list logo
