Re: openbsd-current: cannot suspend -return from zzz-

2014-05-10 Thread Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 10/05/14(Sat) 12:02, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote: >> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda >> wrote: >> > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Martin Pieuchot >> > wrote: >> >> On 09/05/14(Fri) 08:36, Abel Abr

Re: fun with smtpd, (two bugs)

2014-05-10 Thread Frank Brodbeck
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 07:03:14PM +0100, Creamy wrote: > So the manual page is wrong, or at least misleading, because > the syntax of the examples differs between from, sender, and > for, so it's not clear whether the angle brackets are > intended to be literally included, or whether they are just

Re: HID parser

2014-05-10 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 05/05/14(Mon) 04:37, Daniel Bolgheroni wrote: > On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 06:11:41PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > In December 2012 a user reported on misc@ that the Noppoo Mini Choc > > 84 USB keyboard does not work on OpenBSD [0]. More recently, mcbride@ > > and yasuoka@ contacted me becaus

Re: openbsd-current: cannot suspend -return from zzz-

2014-05-10 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 10/05/14(Sat) 12:02, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote: > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda > wrote: > > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Martin Pieuchot > > wrote: > >> On 09/05/14(Fri) 08:36, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote: > >>> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 4:37 AM

Re: [PATCH] Speedstep bug

2014-05-10 Thread Philip Guenther
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Benjamin Baier wrote: > > After setting cpu clock to the minimum value in my BIOS, SpeedStep paniced > on me. > dmesg before and after patching at > http://netzbasis.de/openbsd/speedstep/ > > The patch below works for me, tested on amd64. > low == high == 800 > cpus

Re: fun with smtpd, (two bugs)

2014-05-10 Thread Creamy
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 06:48:18PM +0200, Denis Fondras wrote: > Le 10/05/2014 17:54, Creamy a ?crit : > > > > table creamy db:/etc/mail/creamy.db > > table secrets db:/etc/mail/secrets.db > > accept sender creamy for domain example.com relay via > > smtps+auth://foo...@smtp.creamylan.lan auth >

Re: openbsd-current: cannot suspend -return from zzz-

2014-05-10 Thread Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote: > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Martin Pieuchot > wrote: >> On 09/05/14(Fri) 08:36, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote: >>> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda >>> wrote: >>> >>> This commit breaks re

Re: fun with smtpd, (two bugs)

2014-05-10 Thread Denis Fondras
Le 10/05/2014 17:54, Creamy a écrit : > > table creamy db:/etc/mail/creamy.db > table secrets db:/etc/mail/secrets.db > accept sender creamy for domain example.com relay via > smtps+auth://foo...@smtp.creamylan.lan auth > Shouldn't it be : accept sender for domain example.com ...

Re: [PATCH] rcs: free pointer

2014-05-10 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
Fritjof Bornebusch writes: > Hi tech, > > if ci uses a user defined revision number the pointer was just set to NULL > and not freed correctly. Makes sense to me, ok? I'll probably commit tomorrow if I hear no objection. > fritjof > > Index: ci.c >

fun with smtpd, (two bugs)

2014-05-10 Thread Creamy
Hi, So, now that smtpd is due to replace sendmail as the default mailer, it would be nice if it actually worked correctly... First of all, the man page for smtpd.conf states that directives 'from source' and 'senders' take the name of a table as an argument, which is not true. For example: Your

[PATCH] rcs: free pointer

2014-05-10 Thread Fritjof Bornebusch
Hi tech, if ci uses a user defined revision number the pointer was just set to NULL and not freed correctly. fritjof Index: ci.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/rcs/ci.c,v retrieving revision 1.216 diff -u -p -r1.216 ci.c --- ci.c

[PATCH] Speedstep bug

2014-05-10 Thread Benjamin Baier
Hi tech@ After setting cpu clock to the minimum value in my BIOS, SpeedStep paniced on me. dmesg before and after patching at http://netzbasis.de/openbsd/speedstep/ The patch below works for me, tested on amd64. low == high == 800 cpuspeed == 798 (!) --- sys/arch/amd64/amd64/est.c.orig Fr

Long time no see! Also, year 2100 issue...

2014-05-10 Thread Creamy
Hi loyal Creamy fans, Sorry if you've missed me for the last year or so, but I'm back, (from the future), now. So, anyway, the latest commit to msdosfs_conv.c causes a small problem in the year 2100. The DOS end of time is 12/31/2107. Now that we support > 2038, msdosfs_conv.c was patched to se