awk: xfree() macro
Hi tech,
Forwarding this in case it is considered useful.
Trying to clean up xfree() macro in awk.
Remove check for NULL before calling free().
As a side effect, we might set something to NULL which is already NULL (but I
suppose that's ok).
- Michael
Index: awk.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/awk/awk.h,v
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -p -u -r1.13 awk.h
--- awk.h 6 Oct 2008 20:38:33 - 1.13
+++ awk.h 25 Feb 2015 05:29:37 -
@@ -31,7 +31,11 @@ typedef double Awkfloat;
typedefunsigned char uschar;
-#definexfree(a){ if ((a) != NULL) { free((void *) (a)); (a) =
NULL; } }
+#definexfree(a) \
+do { \
+ free((void *)(a)); \
+ (a) = NULL;\
+} while (0)
#defineNN(p) ((p) ? (p) : "(null)") /* guaranteed non-null for
dprintf
*/
bsd.port.mk.5 typo
don't dis the distfiles
-f
--
philosophy: unintelligible answers to insoluble problems.
Index: ./share/man/man5/bsd.port.mk.5
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man5/bsd.port.mk.5,v
retrieving revision 1.412
diff -u -p -r1.412 bsd.port.mk.5
--- ./share/man/man5/bsd.port.mk.5 23 Dec 2014 14:05:16 - 1.412
+++ ./share/man/man5/bsd.port.mk.5 24 Feb 2015 11:39:50 -
@@ -1198,7 +1198,7 @@ Defaults to empty, set to
.Pa /cdrom/distfiles/${DIST_SUBDIR}
to check that path.
Distribution files are still copied or linked (see
-.Ev FETCH_SYMLINK_DISFILES )
+.Ev FETCH_SYMLINK_DISTFILES )
into
.Ev DISTDIR
if they are found under CDROM_SITE.
Re: faq: remove references to aucat -M option
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 09:34:17AM +0100, Remco wrote: > Alexandre Ratchov wrote: > > > The -M option of aucat was removed long time ago, and as we're at > > it mention about softsynths. > > > > OK? > > > > > +The later are handly for testing the hardware, bypassing most software > > Did you mean ... latter are handy ... ? sure, thanks :/
Re: faq: remove references to aucat -M option
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 07:44:37AM -0500, Nick Holland wrote: > On 02/23/15 04:03, Alexandre Ratchov wrote: > > The -M option of aucat was removed long time ago, and as we're at > > it mention about softsynths. > > > > OK? > > ok nick@, but as I'd consider you an authority on this area, please skim > through the rest of this section looking for similar out-of-date-ness. > That's what I did, the content is still correct. IMHO it's too verbose and there are sections that could be slightly modernized & simplified. Another day.
Re: faq: remove references to aucat -M option
Alexandre Ratchov wrote: > The -M option of aucat was removed long time ago, and as we're at > it mention about softsynths. > > OK? > > +The later are handly for testing the hardware, bypassing most software Did you mean ... latter are handy ... ?
