Re: Fix typo in faq13.html

chenga2 wrote on Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 05:49:44PM -0400: > This fixes a typo in the faq13.html page. Specifically in section 13.7 of > the page. 'handly' should be either 'handy', or 'handily'. Committed, thanks. Ingo > Index: faq13.html > =

Re: banner(1): fix SYNOPSIS

On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 07:42:54PM -0400, Michael Reed wrote: > banner(1) without arguments works fine, so denote it as such > in the manual. > in the context of banner(1), define "works fine". i mean, technically maybe it does but, practically, why try to show this to the reader? is there a use

ntpd user defined constraint margin

Good day, Please see diffs (below) to add a user defined "constraint margin" to ntpd. I also included a basic regress test report (and script). This may be a misguided endeavour, but I am enjoying myself! Comments are more than welcome. Regards, Rob Index: client.c ==

mg(1) dired-do-flagged-delete warpdot

In dired mode, I noticed that if the cursor is on a file marked for deletion when dired-do-flagged-delete (x) is called, the cursor is placed on the left hand side of the window. This diff makes d_expunge behave like other delete functions and calls d_warpdot to() place the cursor on the first char

Fix typo in faq13.html

This fixes a typo in the faq13.html page. Specifically in section 13.7 of the page. 'handly' should be either 'handy', or 'handily'. Index: faq13.html === RCS file: /cvs/www/faq/faq13.html,v retrieving revision 1.155 diff -u -p -

banner(1): fix SYNOPSIS

banner(1) without arguments works fine, so denote it as such in the manual. Index: src/usr.bin/banner/banner.1 === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/banner/banner.1,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -p -r1.8 banner.1 --- src/usr.bin/banner

arch(1): small cleanup

Hi all, I test it out as both `arch' and `machine' and didn't observe any differences. Also, I figured I might as well convert exit(3) to return while touching this code, as was done in [1]. Regard, Michael [1]: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=144095769912804&w=2 Index: src/usr.bin/arch/

Plug a mem-leak in dhcpd(8)

Am I interpreting this correctly? This is the least invasive fix, but it's unfortunate that this function allows the supplied buffer to be NULL. If we made it unconditionally allocate a new buffer, we would have to change some program logic because uses pass stack-allocated statically-sized buffer

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Implementation of POSIX message queues

On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 12:12:01PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: > Dimitris Papastamos wrote: > > I did some very crude benchmarking on my machine and I could push > > about 100k messages per second through a single message queue. > > > > At this point, I can start working on manpages + the necessary

Re: Clarify error/warning reporting in style(9)

Jason McIntyre wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:40:29PM -0400, Michael McConville wrote: > > Could also say "Use the err(3) and warn(3) family of functions." That's > > what the err(3) man page intro refers to it as. > > > > please some developer commit or reject this. thanks, > jmc Ingo gave

Re: Clarify error/warning reporting in style(9)

Jason McIntyre wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:40:29PM -0400, Michael McConville wrote: > > Could also say "Use the err(3) and warn(3) family of functions." That's > > what the err(3) man page intro refers to it as. > > > > please some developer commit or reject this. thanks, i liked the wor

Re: Clarify error/warning reporting in style(9)

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:40:29PM -0400, Michael McConville wrote: > Could also say "Use the err(3) and warn(3) family of functions." That's > what the err(3) man page intro refers to it as. > please some developer commit or reject this. thanks, jmc > Index: share/man/man9/style.9 > ===

Re: make caveat consistent with description in md5.1

On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:46:23PM -0400, Rob Pierce wrote: > Mention that collisions are theorizied for SHA-1 in the caveat. > > Regards, > > Index: md5.1 > === > RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/md5/md5.1,v > retrieving revision 1.44 > diff

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Implementation of POSIX message queues

Dimitris Papastamos wrote: > I did some very crude benchmarking on my machine and I could push > about 100k messages per second through a single message queue. > > At this point, I can start working on manpages + the necessary > userspace glue. > > Is this patch going in the right direction? I d

Re: Stricter route check

Hi, I'll test your diff on an x86 multiprocessor now. Will let you know if there are any issues. My server is not a router, though On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > Here's an alternative path towards putting rtisvalid(9) checks in the > tree. The end goal is to stop usi

Re: iwm(4) rx reset fix

On 22/09/15(Tue) 19:55, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 01:23:17PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: > > Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > Properly reset the RX ring by clearing RX buffer status exposed to > > > hardware. > > > Found by Matthew Dillon while porting FreeBSD's iwm(4) to Dragonfl

Re: [patch] tame.2 documentation about systrace.4

On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 04:00:56PM +0059, Jason McIntyre wrote: > > > > there is a "d" missing at the end. > > > > And "In a tamed program, systrace(4) is disabled" sounds better to me, but > > jmc might have an opinion on that. no problem, I am not too confident in my english wording :) > > Th

Stricter route check

Here's an alternative path towards putting rtisvalid(9) checks in the tree. The end goal is to stop using !RTF_UP routes, so simply bail if such route is passed to ARP or NDP instead of trying to fetch a compatible one. I hope this will help me find some bugs, I'd appreciate tests and oks. Inde