openssl.cnf req defaults -> default_md sha256

U On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Jonathan Gray > wrote: > On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 10:53:34AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> On 2014/10/01 19:05, Joel Sing wrote: >> > > I should also add that the other obvious/easy "fix" is to initialise digest >> > > in

fcntl F_SETOWN pipe

Hi, Setting fcntl(F_SETOWN) for a pipe does not work. fcntl F_SETOWN: Inappropriate ioctl for device In sys_fcntl() the ioctl(TIOCSPGRP) is called, but the pipe expects SIOCSPGRP. Sockets have a specal case for the same reason. I would prefer that socketpair and pipe behave identical, so I

Re: pledge(2) in script(1)

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 12:18:07PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:45:59AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: > > My script(1) just got killed with > > > > script(15938): syscall 37 > > Can you provide a reproducible test case? What did you do? > syscall 37 is SYS_kill: $

pledge(2) hangman(6)

Hi tech@! Let's give some pledge(2) love to hangman(6)! It seems to work fine for me with the patch mentioned below, nevertheless please be aware that I don't consider myself a developer, just a mere OpenBSD user with 'security uncle syndrome' :D Index: src/games/hangman/main.c

Re: make iked not static

Christian Weisgerber(na...@mips.inka.de) on 2015.10.20 20:46:12 +: > On 2015-10-20, Reyk Floeter wrote: > > > For historical reasons, isakmpd and iked are compiled static: > > people used NFS over ipsec. > > > > Is anyone still using this? Is it more than one person? > > >

Re: make iked not static

On 2015/10/20 23:00, Sebastian Benoit wrote: > Christian Weisgerber(na...@mips.inka.de) on 2015.10.20 20:46:12 +: > > On 2015-10-20, Reyk Floeter wrote: > > > > > For historical reasons, isakmpd and iked are compiled static: > > > people used NFS over ipsec. isakmpd is an

pledge(2) hangman(6)

Hi tech@! Let's give some pledge(2) love to hangman(6)! It seems to work fine for me with the patch mentioned below, nevertheless please be aware that I don't consider myself a developer, just a mere OpenBSD user with 'security uncle syndrome' :D That being said please don't beat me to

accept 39B9-1135-C247

accept 39B9-1135-C247

A couple of style(9) tweaks

=== RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/ed/main.c,v retrieving revision 1.53 diff -u -p -r1.53 main.c --- bin/ed/main.c 9 Oct 2015 21:24:05 - 1.53 +++ bin/ed/main.c 20 Oct 2015 22:49:53 - @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ top:

Re: Unlocking ix(4) a bit further

On 16.10.2015. 20:30, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 14:13:52 +0200 >> From: Martin Pieuchot >> >> On 08/10/15(Thu) 20:49, Mark Kettenis wrote: Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 14:30:11 +0200 (CEST) From: Mark Kettenis Since