On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 4:03 AM, Theo Buehler wrote:
> Committed, thanks!
Thank you! I took your advice and imported the latest changes
to imsg.c from OpenBSD changes to FreeBSD:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/lib/libopenbsd/imsg.c
--
Craig
Daniel Micay wrote:
> Not quite as good as a random value per canary, but a random value per
> page would already be pretty fine-grained and each canary can still be
> made unique via something like the current `random ^ hash(address)`.
One thing to remember is that a number of architectures are s
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> allow some inspection of the kevent structs.
...
> --- kern/kern_event.c 5 Dec 2015 10:11:53 - 1.67
> +++ kern/kern_event.c 8 Dec 2015 17:41:29 -
> @@ -508,6 +508,10 @@ sys_kevent(struct proc *p, void *v, regi
>
On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 07:47 -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> This is a kind of two steps forward, one step back diff.
>
> I would like for the canary to be placed directly adjacent to the end
> of the
> user specified size. No slack. To accomplish this, we record the
> original size
> of the allocation
Hi,
Currently two checks in free() function confirm the correctness of
freedsize argument. I think that it's better to check that provided
freedsize fall into the same bucket that was recorded in kmemusage
struct: it covers both cases.
Index: sys/kern/kern_malloc.c
==
Hi people,
the following patch allows vi (and ex) to do tilde expansion without
forking off a shell. The algorithm is similar to the one in mg, modulo
adaptions for the way vi handles line buffers and such. This allows
editing files like `~/foobar` in secure (-S) mode, where fork and
Hi,
This patch adds additional informational to ddb's "show malloc"
command about the largest consumers of memory.
This is my first patch for OpenBSD, so I will be very grateful for any
comments. Thanks in advance!
Index: sys/kern/kern_malloc.c
==
On 02/13/14 11:52, Paul Irofti wrote:
Could people NFS-boot or at least try the ramdisk kernel on similar
models (e.g. DSR-500N, DSR-1000, DSR-1000N) and report back so we can
expand the supported list?
DSR-500N:
U-Boot 1.1.1 (Development build, svnversion: exported) (Build time: Sep
1 2010
in_pcbbind and in6_pcbbind both extends SO_REUSEADDR for multicast
addresses so that it turns into a SO_REUSEPORT. But the check is done
in such a way that you cannot bind a SO_REUSEPORT-enabled socket to a
multicast address *after* you bound a SO_REUSEADDR-enabled socket to
the same address.
*But
> Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 13:00:49 -0500
> From: Michael McConville
>
> I thought I'd look for other examples after the grep fix.
>
> ok?
It really is confusing to use off_t for something that's not a byte
offset. If integer overflow really is an issue you care about, use
"long long".
Note that
This is a kind of two steps forward, one step back diff.
I would like for the canary to be placed directly adjacent to the end of the
user specified size. No slack. To accomplish this, we record the original size
of the allocation at the end, then we can walk backwards to find the canary.
Mechanic
> Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 21:58:49 +1000
> From: David Gwynne
>
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 02:00:16PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> > the current code for serialising if_start calls for mpsafe nics does what
> > it says.
>
> as per mpi@s suggestion, this makes the ifq code responsible for
> the tas
> From: Bob Beck
> Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 22:58:03 -0700
>
> Since I can't think of a sane reason to check this and care in any
> script, yes, kill it.
Unfortunately you can't apply your rules about sanity to this thing
called autoconf.
Committed, thanks!
Note: The patch didn't apply cleanly. There's been the following commit
in the meantime, which probably is of interest for FreeBSD, too (there
were corresponding changes in the imsg consumers on the same day).
revision 1.12
date: 2015/12/05 13:06:52; author: claudio; state:
Hello,
FYI, my last firewall in production :
OpenBSD 5.7 (GENERIC.MP) #2: Mon Jul 27 16:16:48 CEST 2015
cpu0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1271 v3 @ 3.60GHz
ix0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82599"
Peaks at 46% cpu on core1, traffic around 2 Gbps (230 kpps).
I'm very eager to see it with a full M
15 matches
Mail list logo