Document the sendsyslog2(2) system call

Hi, The the inlined patch aims to document the new sendsyslog2 system call, and add the corresponding MLINKS entry. Note that I do not put "syslog(3) logopt LOG_CONS" or "syslog(3) LOG_CONS flag" because actually in syslog(3) it says that it redirects to "/dev/console", so I thought that could be

Re: Remove TMPDIR support from sendbug(1) and newfs(8) manpages

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 03:11:16PM -0700, Rafael Neves wrote: > Hi, > > The TMPDIR enviroment support was removed from sendbug(1) and newfs(8), > but the manpages still document them. The inlined patches remove these > leftovers. > > Regards, > Rafael Neves > fixed, thanks. jmc > > Patch: >

Remove TMPDIR support from sendbug(1) and newfs(8) manpages

Hi, The TMPDIR enviroment support was removed from sendbug(1) and newfs(8), but the manpages still document them. The inlined patches remove these leftovers. Regards, Rafael Neves Patch: Index: sbin/newfs/newfs.8 === RCS file:

Re: undefined behaviour in add_entropy_words()

Martin Natano wrote: > Hi, > > The add_entropy_words() function performs a right shift by > (32 - entropy_input_rotate) bits, with entropy_input_rotate being an > integer between [0..31]. This can lead to a shift of 32 on a 32 bit > value, which is undefined behaviour in C. The standard says

Re: Harmful casts in ufs

Todd C. Miller wrote: > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:22:04 +0100, Martin Natano wrote: > > > Casting the result of ext2fs_size() and DIP(ip, size) to int potentially > > truncates the result. Issue found by Stefan Kempf, see > > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech=145495905416536 . > > > > While there I

Re: [patch] Fix carp(4) with balancing ip / ip-stealth

On 02/16/16 11:23, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 12/02/16(Fri) 16:33, Florian Riehm wrote: >> Hi Tech, >> >> I have noticed that CARP IP-Balancing is broken, so I am testing and >> fixing it. >> >> The first problem came in with this commit: >>

Re: Fix overflow check in sys/netinet6/in6.c

On 17/02/16(Wed) 20:38, Stefan Kempf wrote: > Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > On 13/02/16(Sat) 18:51, Stefan Kempf wrote: > > > Some thoughts about this: > > > > > > If this particular type of undefined behavior is really a concern: maybe > > > looking for bounds/overflow checks that are incorrect

Re: faq11 typo

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 01:14:03PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote: > --- faq11.html.orig Thu Feb 18 11:11:41 2016 > +++ faq11.htmlThu Feb 18 11:12:14 2016 > @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ Some X applications are very lean; others will seeming > all the processor and RAM you can give them. > Of course, some

faq11 typo

--- faq11.html.orig Thu Feb 18 11:11:41 2016 +++ faq11.html Thu Feb 18 11:12:14 2016 @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ Some X applications are very lean; others will seeming all the processor and RAM you can give them. Of course, some users just like to use X to provide a large number of

Re: LPRng removed, how can I get a copy of last port before removal?

On 2016/02/17 22:30, Chris Bennett wrote: > Last version from author was 3.8.35 done at end of 2010. > Appears that many useful features are present, many other problems like > Kerberos need removal. > Author said that IPP would start at 4.x.x versions, which have never > been done. > Is using

/usr/X11/README typo

THere seems to be a typo in macppc's /usr/X11/README Jan --- README.orig Thu Feb 18 11:14:56 2016 +++ README Thu Feb 18 11:15:25 2016 @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ hardware. If your hardware is not properly autodetect or not supported as you wish, you will have to create a configuration

Re: Optimize pledge-related notes in 59.html

Theo de Raadt openbsd.org> writes: > so thanks for your suggestion. have you ever noticed how suggestions > are taken less seriously when they are not formatted as a diff? --- 59.html.origThu Feb 18 11:45:24 2016 +++ 59.html Thu Feb 18 12:03:29 2016 @@ -100,21 +100,21 @@