OK with me.
The selection of those numbers used to follow various other "standards",
but that is not important these days.
> this adds an MID entry for arm64. That's the next reasonable one in the
> list.
>
> ok?
>
> Patrick
>
> diff --git a/sys/sys/exec.h b/sys/sys/exec.h
> index cd0a8c4..8b
Hi,
this adds an MID entry for arm64. That's the next reasonable one in the
list.
ok?
Patrick
diff --git a/sys/sys/exec.h b/sys/sys/exec.h
index cd0a8c4..8bcfc04 100644
--- a/sys/sys/exec.h
+++ b/sys/sys/exec.h
@@ -287,6 +287,7 @@ struct exec {
#defineMID_HPPA154 /* hppa *
Hey,
i am trying to install OpenBSD on a Raid1 created by softraid0. My
drives are sd0 and sd1. The created raid1 is sd3. The install works fine
until OpenBSD tryes to write the bootblocks. But it fails with the error
message: "Failed to install bootblocks".
If its not possible to do this set
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:44:44AM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:37:10AM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> > This diff makes LLVM do all the OpenBSD stuff for AArch64.
> >
> > ok?
>
> If you plan to submit this upstream, you should also update the test
> cases accordin
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:37:10AM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> This diff makes LLVM do all the OpenBSD stuff for AArch64.
>
> ok?
If you plan to submit this upstream, you should also update the test
cases accordingly.
Joerg
Hi,
ARM IHI 0056B, the ELF spec for the ARM 64-bit Architecture, specifies
the following for the ELF e_machine attribute:
An object file conforming to this specification must have the value
EM_AARCH64 (183, 0xB7).
ok?
Patrick
diff --git a/sys/sys/exec_elf.h b/sys/sys/exec_elf.h
index 5b24563..
Hi,
a clang binary using the AArch64 backend currently does not use
proper OpenBSD defines and specifics. This is because we don't
tell clang to use OpenBSD target info if it encounters an AArch64
target.
This diff makes LLVM do all the OpenBSD stuff for AArch64.
ok?
Patrick
diff --git a/gnu/
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 21:52 +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> > This fixes up tsleep priorities in vio(4) and makes sleeps
> > interruptable so that ifconfig can be killed with ^C. Tested
> > on qemu with a previous diff that makes vio(4) hang there.
> >
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 21:10 +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Rafael Zalamena wrote:
>
> > > Maybe something like this is enough already (untested):
> >
> > I tried your diff without Mike's if_vio diff and it doesn't panic anymore,
> > however it doesn't work.
> >
> > vioX ca
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 06:56:42PM +, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> ah. i have a habit of committing diffs from developers because i keep
> losing track of who has commit. this time i'm giving oks to people
> without commit...
>
> fixed, thanks for the mail, and sorry about the (perpetual) confusion
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 07:01:52PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 08:56:53PM +0100, Ingo Feinerer wrote:
> > the "Lenovo N5321gw" is working for me with umb(4)
> > (https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=147992993614369&w=2). So mention it
> > as a supported device in umb.4?
> >
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:36:42AM -0800, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 04:20:25PM -0800, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> > I forgot about adding the newly supported Sierra Wireless EM7455 to the
> > umb(4) man page.
> >
> > Bryan
> >
> >
> > Index: share/man/man4/umb.4
> > ===
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 04:20:25PM -0800, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> I forgot about adding the newly supported Sierra Wireless EM7455 to the
> umb(4) man page.
>
> Bryan
>
>
> Index: share/man/man4/umb.4
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sh
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 08:56:53PM +0100, Ingo Feinerer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the "Lenovo N5321gw" is working for me with umb(4)
> (https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=147992993614369&w=2). So mention it
> as a supported device in umb.4?
>
> (Lenovo seems to call it Ericsson N5321gw on its support si
Hi Otto,
Thank you for the clarifications. Indeed reading the man page more
carefully I understood the difference between option and expression, and
using -prune.
Sorry for the noise.
Senthil
On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 04:42:37PM +0100, Senthil Kumar
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 04:42:37PM +0100, Senthil Kumar M wrote:
> Hello Tech,
>
> In the find(1) man page, for the option `-f':
>
> -f path
> Specifies a file hierarchy for find to traverse. File
> hierarchies may be specified without the -f option if they are
>
On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 16:16:19 +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this diff allows us to build clang with AArch64 support. It's based on
> the ARM lib Makefiles modified to compile the AArch64 code.
>
> ok?
Looks good to me, and the aarch64/arm64 naming thing can always be
bikeshed later. ok.
Hello Tech,
In the find(1) man page, for the option `-f':
-f path
Specifies a file hierarchy for find to traverse. File
hierarchies may be specified without the -f option if they are
given immediately after any other options.
shouldn't this be `before' i
Hi,
this diff allows us to build clang with AArch64 support. It's based on
the ARM lib Makefiles modified to compile the AArch64 code.
ok?
Patrick
diff --git a/gnu/usr.bin/clang/Makefile.arch b/gnu/usr.bin/clang/Makefile.arch
index b372b68..3883c5e 100644
--- a/gnu/usr.bin/clang/Makefile.arch
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 09:10:44PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Rafael Zalamena wrote:
>
> > > Maybe something like this is enough already (untested):
> >
> > I tried your diff without Mike's if_vio diff and it doesn't panic anymore,
> > however it doesn't work.
> >
> > vi
20 matches
Mail list logo
