Re: mounting tmpfs ???

2016-12-15 Thread Theo Buehler
Please move this thread to misc@ if it really needs to be continued.

Re: mounting tmpfs ???

2016-12-15 Thread Leo Unglaub
Hey, On 12/15/16 16:34, Kent R. Spillner wrote: So fixing the BUG section of the man page ? That's not what "maintain" means. i think by "maintain" he means that you fix the bugs mentioned in the man page and after that continue to improve the code beyond just fixing bugs. Greegings Leo

Re: mounting tmpfs ???

2016-12-15 Thread Kent R. Spillner
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 09:47:53AM -0500, sven falempin wrote: > > maintain tmpfs > > > So fixing the BUG section of the man page ? That's not what "maintain" means.

Re: mounting tmpfs ???

2016-12-15 Thread sven falempin
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Martin Schröder wrote: > 2016-12-14 17:07 GMT+01:00 sven falempin : > > i am using this daily, what can i do !? > > maintain tmpfs > > Best >Martin > > So fixing the BUG section of the man page ? -- --

dhcrelay(8): support replacing Relay Agent Info

2016-12-15 Thread Rafael Zalamena
This diff adds dhcrelay support for replacing Relay Agent Information on incoming packets with our configuration. This might be useful if you want to override user sent information or to adapt the incoming packet to another network. ok? Index: dhcrelay.8 ==

E5v4 pciids

2016-12-15 Thread Hrvoje Popovski
Hi all, patch in attachment adds some E5v4 pciids that i'm seeing in supermicro 1018R-WR box with E5-1650 v4. before patch: vendor "Intel", unknown product 0x6f20 (class system subclass miscellaneous, rev 0x01) at pci0 dev 4 function 0 not configured vendor "Intel", unknown product 0x6f21 (cla